Your message dated Tue, 16 Aug 2005 04:43:48 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#321905: fixed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Aug 2005 06:16:42 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Aug 07 23:16:42 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from 148.red-213-96-98.pooles.rima-tde.net (silicio) [213.96.98.148] 
(Debian-exim)
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
        id 1E20wE-0002dj-00; Sun, 07 Aug 2005 23:16:42 -0700
Received: from jfs by silicio with local (Exim 4.52)
        id 1E20wD-0002PB-2l
        for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 08 Aug 2005 08:16:41 +0200
Date: Mon, 8 Aug 2005 08:16:40 +0200
From: Javier =?iso-8859-1?Q?Fern=E1ndez-Sanguino_Pe=F1a?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: colorize: Dummy package still needed?
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
        protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="uCPdOCrL+PnN2Vxy"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02


--uCPdOCrL+PnN2Vxy
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline

Package: colorize
Version: 0.3.1-4
Priority: wishlist

This dummy package is present in sarge, etc and sid.  As this is a dummy
transition-only package (for woody), is there any reason this
package should still exist in the distribution? Notice that we currently
only support upgrade paths from stable (currently sarge) to
"new stable" (currently etch) and in both these distributions
this package is a dummy package. For more information read the
Release Notes [1].

If this package is no longer required, please ask for its removal by
reassigning this bug to ftp.debian.org. If you want to provide
upgrade paths for woody for the time being please don't forget to
remove this package before etch is frozen.

Also, reassign the pending bugs of colorize (there is 1 pending bug)
to the new package.

Regards

Javier

[1]
http://www.nl.debian.org/releases/stable/i386/release-notes/ch-upgrading#s-system-status


--uCPdOCrL+PnN2Vxy
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFC9vjIsandgtyBSwkRAmKfAJ981ql1xZj78KQJpJvtcH6Cuul+bQCfctXr
NjqSTss5irTDKMmsMlI4Dy8=
=Xb/G
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--uCPdOCrL+PnN2Vxy--

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 321905-close) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Aug 2005 11:49:20 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Aug 16 04:49:20 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from jeroen by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
        id 1E4zrA-0006Qk-00; Tue, 16 Aug 2005 04:43:48 -0700
From: Debian Archive Maintenance <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: melanie $Revision: 1.43 $
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Subject: Bug#321905: fixed
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Jeroen van Wolffelaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2005 04:43:48 -0700
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following
package(s) have been removed from unstable:

  colorize |    0.3.1-4 | source, all

Note that the package(s) have simply been removed from the tag
database and may (or may not) still be in the pool; this is not a bug.
The package(s) will be physically removed automatically when no suite
references them (and in the case of source, when no binary references
it).  Please also remember that the changes have been done on the
master archive (ftp-master.debian.org) and will not propagate to any
mirrors (ftp.debian.org included) until the next cron.daily run at the
earliest.

Packages are never removed from testing by hand.  Testing tracks
unstable and will automatically remove packages which were removed
from unstable when removing them from testing causes no dependency
problems.

Bugs which have been reported against this package are not automatically
removed from the Bug Tracking System.  Please check all open bugs and
close them or re-assign them to another package if the removed package
was superseded by another one.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Jeroen van Wolffelaar (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to