Your message dated Tue, 16 Mar 2010 21:50:00 +0000
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Bug#572036: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #572036,
regarding RM: libnet-ssh-ruby -- RoQA; superseded by libnet-ssh2-ruby
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
572036: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=572036
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: libnet-ssh-ruby1.9.1,libnet-ssh2-ruby1.9.1
Version: libnet-ssh-ruby1.9.1/2.0.15-1
Version: libnet-ssh2-ruby1.9.1/2.0.15-1
Severity: serious
User: [email protected]
Usertags: edos-file-overwrite
Date: 2010-02-28
Architecture: amd64
Distribution: sid
Hi,
automatic installation tests of packages that share a file and at the
same time do not conflict by their package dependency relationships has
detected the following problem:
WARNING: The following packages cannot be authenticated!
libruby1.9.1 libopenssl-ruby1.9.1 libnet-ssh-ruby1.9.1 ruby1.9.1
libnet-ssh2-ruby1.9.1
W: cowdancer: unsupported operation flock, read-only open and
fchown/fchmod/flock are not supported: tried openning dev:inode of 2055:5407727
W: cowdancer: unsupported operation flock, read-only open and
fchown/fchmod/flock are not supported: tried openning dev:inode of 2055:5407760
W: cowdancer: unsupported operation flock, read-only open and
fchown/fchmod/flock are not supported: tried openning dev:inode of 2055:5406857
Authentication warning overridden.
Can not write log, openpty() failed (/dev/pts not mounted?)
Selecting previously deselected package libruby1.9.1.
(Reading database ... 12294 files and directories currently installed.)
Unpacking libruby1.9.1 (from .../libruby1.9.1_1.9.1.378-1_amd64.deb) ...
Selecting previously deselected package libopenssl-ruby1.9.1.
Unpacking libopenssl-ruby1.9.1 (from
.../libopenssl-ruby1.9.1_1.9.1.378-1_amd64.deb) ...
Selecting previously deselected package libnet-ssh-ruby1.9.1.
Unpacking libnet-ssh-ruby1.9.1 (from .../libnet-ssh-ruby1.9.1_2.0.15-1_all.deb)
...
Selecting previously deselected package ruby1.9.1.
Unpacking ruby1.9.1 (from .../ruby1.9.1_1.9.1.378-1_amd64.deb) ...
Selecting previously deselected package libnet-ssh2-ruby1.9.1.
Unpacking libnet-ssh2-ruby1.9.1 (from
.../libnet-ssh2-ruby1.9.1_2.0.15-1_all.deb) ...
dpkg: error processing
/var/cache/apt/archives/libnet-ssh2-ruby1.9.1_2.0.15-1_all.deb (--unpack):
trying to overwrite '/usr/lib/ruby/1.9.1/net/ssh.rb', which is also in package
libnet-ssh-ruby1.9.1 0:2.0.15-1
Processing triggers for man-db ...
W: cowdancer: unsupported operation flock, read-only open and
fchown/fchmod/flock are not supported: tried openning dev:inode of 2055:5407727
W: cowdancer: unsupported operation flock, read-only open and
fchown/fchmod/flock are not supported: tried openning dev:inode of 2055:5407760
W: cowdancer: unsupported operation flock, read-only open and
fchown/fchmod/flock are not supported: tried openning dev:inode of 2055:5406857
Errors were encountered while processing:
/var/cache/apt/archives/libnet-ssh2-ruby1.9.1_2.0.15-1_all.deb
E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)
This is a serious bug as it makes installation fail, and violates
sections 7.6.1 and 10.1 of the policy. An optimal solution would
consist in only one of the packages installing that file, and renaming
or removing the file in the other package. Depending on the
circumstances you might also consider Replace relations or file
diversions. If the conflicting situation cannot be resolved then, as a
last resort, the two packages have to declare a mutual
Conflict. Please take into account that Replaces, Conflicts and
diversions should only be used when packages provide different
implementations for the same functionality.
Here is a list of files that are known to be shared by both packages
(according to the Contents file for sid/amd64, which may be
slightly out of sync):
/usr/lib/ruby/1.9.1/net/ssh.rb
/usr/lib/ruby/1.9.1/net/ssh/authentication/agent.rb
/usr/lib/ruby/1.9.1/net/ssh/authentication/constants.rb
/usr/lib/ruby/1.9.1/net/ssh/authentication/key_manager.rb
/usr/lib/ruby/1.9.1/net/ssh/authentication/methods/abstract.rb
/usr/lib/ruby/1.9.1/net/ssh/authentication/methods/hostbased.rb
/usr/lib/ruby/1.9.1/net/ssh/authentication/methods/keyboard_interactive.rb
/usr/lib/ruby/1.9.1/net/ssh/authentication/methods/password.rb
/usr/lib/ruby/1.9.1/net/ssh/authentication/methods/publickey.rb
/usr/lib/ruby/1.9.1/net/ssh/authentication/pageant.rb
/usr/lib/ruby/1.9.1/net/ssh/authentication/session.rb
/usr/lib/ruby/1.9.1/net/ssh/buffer.rb
/usr/lib/ruby/1.9.1/net/ssh/buffered_io.rb
/usr/lib/ruby/1.9.1/net/ssh/config.rb
/usr/lib/ruby/1.9.1/net/ssh/connection/channel.rb
/usr/lib/ruby/1.9.1/net/ssh/connection/constants.rb
/usr/lib/ruby/1.9.1/net/ssh/connection/session.rb
/usr/lib/ruby/1.9.1/net/ssh/connection/term.rb
/usr/lib/ruby/1.9.1/net/ssh/errors.rb
/usr/lib/ruby/1.9.1/net/ssh/key_factory.rb
/usr/lib/ruby/1.9.1/net/ssh/known_hosts.rb
/usr/lib/ruby/1.9.1/net/ssh/loggable.rb
/usr/lib/ruby/1.9.1/net/ssh/packet.rb
/usr/lib/ruby/1.9.1/net/ssh/prompt.rb
/usr/lib/ruby/1.9.1/net/ssh/proxy/errors.rb
/usr/lib/ruby/1.9.1/net/ssh/proxy/http.rb
/usr/lib/ruby/1.9.1/net/ssh/proxy/socks4.rb
/usr/lib/ruby/1.9.1/net/ssh/proxy/socks5.rb
/usr/lib/ruby/1.9.1/net/ssh/ruby_compat.rb
/usr/lib/ruby/1.9.1/net/ssh/service/forward.rb
/usr/lib/ruby/1.9.1/net/ssh/test.rb
/usr/lib/ruby/1.9.1/net/ssh/test/channel.rb
/usr/lib/ruby/1.9.1/net/ssh/test/extensions.rb
/usr/lib/ruby/1.9.1/net/ssh/test/kex.rb
/usr/lib/ruby/1.9.1/net/ssh/test/local_packet.rb
/usr/lib/ruby/1.9.1/net/ssh/test/packet.rb
/usr/lib/ruby/1.9.1/net/ssh/test/remote_packet.rb
/usr/lib/ruby/1.9.1/net/ssh/test/script.rb
/usr/lib/ruby/1.9.1/net/ssh/test/socket.rb
/usr/lib/ruby/1.9.1/net/ssh/transport/algorithms.rb
/usr/lib/ruby/1.9.1/net/ssh/transport/cipher_factory.rb
/usr/lib/ruby/1.9.1/net/ssh/transport/constants.rb
/usr/lib/ruby/1.9.1/net/ssh/transport/hmac.rb
/usr/lib/ruby/1.9.1/net/ssh/transport/hmac/abstract.rb
/usr/lib/ruby/1.9.1/net/ssh/transport/hmac/md5.rb
/usr/lib/ruby/1.9.1/net/ssh/transport/hmac/md5_96.rb
/usr/lib/ruby/1.9.1/net/ssh/transport/hmac/none.rb
/usr/lib/ruby/1.9.1/net/ssh/transport/hmac/sha1.rb
/usr/lib/ruby/1.9.1/net/ssh/transport/hmac/sha1_96.rb
/usr/lib/ruby/1.9.1/net/ssh/transport/identity_cipher.rb
/usr/lib/ruby/1.9.1/net/ssh/transport/kex.rb
/usr/lib/ruby/1.9.1/net/ssh/transport/kex/diffie_hellman_group1_sha1.rb
/usr/lib/ruby/1.9.1/net/ssh/transport/kex/diffie_hellman_group_exchange_sha1.rb
/usr/lib/ruby/1.9.1/net/ssh/transport/openssl.rb
/usr/lib/ruby/1.9.1/net/ssh/transport/packet_stream.rb
/usr/lib/ruby/1.9.1/net/ssh/transport/server_version.rb
/usr/lib/ruby/1.9.1/net/ssh/transport/session.rb
/usr/lib/ruby/1.9.1/net/ssh/transport/state.rb
/usr/lib/ruby/1.9.1/net/ssh/verifiers/lenient.rb
/usr/lib/ruby/1.9.1/net/ssh/verifiers/null.rb
/usr/lib/ruby/1.9.1/net/ssh/verifiers/strict.rb
/usr/lib/ruby/1.9.1/net/ssh/version.rb
This bug is assigned to both packages. If you, the maintainers of
the two packages in question, have agreed on which of the packages will
resolve the problem please reassign the bug to that package.
-Ralf.
PS: for more information about the detection of file overwrite errors
of this kind see http://edos.debian.net/file-overwrites/.
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following
package(s) have been removed from unstable:
libnet-ssh-ruby | 2.0.15-1 | source
libnet-ssh-ruby1.8 | 2.0.15-1 | all
libnet-ssh-ruby1.9.1 | 2.0.15-1 | all
------------------- Reason -------------------
RoQA; superseded by libnet-ssh2-ruby
----------------------------------------------
Note that the package(s) have simply been removed from the tag
database and may (or may not) still be in the pool; this is not a bug.
The package(s) will be physically removed automatically when no suite
references them (and in the case of source, when no binary references
it). Please also remember that the changes have been done on the
master archive (ftp-master.debian.org) and will not propagate to any
mirrors (ftp.debian.org included) until the next cron.daily run at the
earliest.
Packages are usually not removed from testing by hand. Testing tracks
unstable and will automatically remove packages which were removed
from unstable when removing them from testing causes no dependency
problems. The release team can force a removal from testing if it is
really needed, please contact them if this should be the case.
Bugs which have been reported against this package are not automatically
removed from the Bug Tracking System. Please check all open bugs and
close them or re-assign them to another package if the removed package
was superseded by another one.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to [email protected].
The full log for this bug can be viewed at http://bugs.debian.org/572036
This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
[email protected].
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Torsten Werner (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)
--- End Message ---
