Your message dated Wed, 24 Mar 2010 20:28:13 +0000 (WET)
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Package dhcp has been removed from Debian
has caused the Debian Bug report #537109,
regarding dhcp: interface not limited to eth0 by default as intended
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
537109: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=537109
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: dhcp
Version: 2.0pl5dfsg1-20
Severity: important
In the script /etc/init.d/dhcp the is an assignment: INTERFACES="eth0"
Later, this variable is used on the --exec line to start dhcpd on only the
interfaces specified in the variable $INTERFACES.
The problem is that INTERFACES acts as a reserved word, and usually returns
blank.
Changing the variable name to INTERFACEZ fixed the problem, and all worked as
expected.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 5.0.2
APT prefers stable
APT policy: (1100, 'stable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.26-2-686 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ISO-8859-1)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Versions of packages dhcp depends on:
ii libc6 2.7-18 GNU C Library: Shared libraries
ii netbase 4.34 Basic TCP/IP networking system
dhcp recommends no packages.
dhcp suggests no packages.
-- no debconf information
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 2.0pl5dfsg1-20.2+rm
You filed the bug http://bugs.debian.org/537109 in Debian BTS
against the package dhcp. I'm closing it at *unstable*, but it will
remain open for older distributions.
For more information about this package's removal, read
http://bugs.debian.org/446386. That bug might give the reasons why
this package was removed and suggestions of possible replacements.
Don't hesitate to reply to this mail if you have any question.
Thank you for your contribution to Debian.
--
Marco Rodrigues
--- End Message ---