Your message dated Thu, 18 Aug 2005 09:35:25 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line [Pkg-zope-developers] Bug#323616: workflow missing from package
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Aug 2005 15:40:08 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Aug 17 08:40:08 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from venus.arcdiversified.com [204.116.111.7]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1E5Q1Q-0000wf-00; Wed, 17 Aug 2005 08:40:08 -0700
Received: from [192.168.3.124] (helo=[192.168.3.124] ident=dougg)
by venus.arcdiversified.com with asmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 1E5Q0U-0003XN-00
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 17 Aug 2005 10:39:10 -0500
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2005 10:39:59 -0500
From: Doug Grainger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Debian Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20050602)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: workflow missing from package
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Package: zope3-lib
Version: 3.0.91-1
zope.app.workflow does not exist in the package, and is not included in the
tarball that the package
was created with (apparently Zope-3.1.0b1).
It *is* included in the Zope-3.1.0b1 tag at svn.zope.org, though, so I'm
somewhat confused as to why
it's not included in the package. I also can't find any documentation in the
package regarding its
removal.
uname -a: Linux it-dougg 2.6.8-2-386 #1 Thu May 19 17:40:50 JST 2005 i686
GNU/Linux
python2.4 version 2.4.1-2
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 323616-done) by bugs.debian.org; 18 Aug 2005 07:35:42 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Aug 18 00:35:42 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from diana.kobold.it [81.208.30.142]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1E5ewA-0008Je-00; Thu, 18 Aug 2005 00:35:42 -0700
Received: from Debian-exim by diana.kobold.it with spam-scanned (Exim 4.50)
id 1E5ewI-0002BP-66
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 18 Aug 2005 09:35:51 +0200
Received: from catv-50638d13.catv.broadband.hu ([80.99.141.19]
helo=localhost.localdomain)
by diana.kobold.it with esmtpsa (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32)
(Exim 4.50)
id 1E5ew6-0002BC-V7; Thu, 18 Aug 2005 09:35:45 +0200
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost.localdomain with esmtp (Exim 4.52)
id 1E5evu-0001YB-G4; Thu, 18 Aug 2005 09:35:26 +0200
Subject: Re: [Pkg-zope-developers] Bug#323616: workflow missing from package
From: Fabio Tranchitella <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Doug Grainger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-Sv+EFz2j9VKIXFpNFdZJ"
Organization: Debian (http://www.debian.org)
Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2005 09:35:25 +0200
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.3
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
--=-Sv+EFz2j9VKIXFpNFdZJ
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Il giorno mer, 17/08/2005 alle 16.41 -0500, Doug Grainger ha scritto:
> ok, basically, the book is out of date, and i should be using the wfmc pa=
ckage for workflow-related=20
> things. i guess you can mark that bug invalid.
Thanks for pointing this out, let's close that bug report.
--=20
Fabio Tranchitella <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> .''`.
Proud Debian GNU/Linux developer, admin and user. : :' :
`. `'`
http://people.debian.org/~kobold/ `-
_____________________________________________________________________
1024D/7F961564, fpr 5465 6E69 E559 6466 BF3D 9F01 2BF8 EE2B 7F96 1564
--=-Sv+EFz2j9VKIXFpNFdZJ
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQBDBDo9K/juK3+WFWQRAqgKAKCJMA+ub2FaN44KR5oE0AdjF6bp2gCcD7kd
fVzLaz6cTrJ7MhlfXBFoPtU=
=CeoF
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-Sv+EFz2j9VKIXFpNFdZJ--
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
