Your message dated Thu, 18 Aug 2005 16:27:57 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#321496: caff doesn't understand gpg's IMPORT_OK
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 5 Aug 2005 20:14:50 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Aug 05 13:14:50 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from a-eskwadraat.nl [131.211.39.72] 
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
        id 1E18af-0001AD-00; Fri, 05 Aug 2005 13:14:50 -0700
Received: from jeroen by A-Eskwadraat.nl with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
        id 1E18ae-0007cK-00
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 05 Aug 2005 22:14:48 +0200
Date: Fri, 5 Aug 2005 22:14:48 +0200
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: caff doesn't understand gpg's IMPORT_OK
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
From: Jeroen van Wolffelaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: signing-party

Note: this is with latest subversion.

[EMAIL PROTECTED]/debian/caff$ svn up
At revision 156.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/debian/caff$ ./caff 0464E7E5
[INFO] fetching keys, this will take a while...
[NOTICE] got unknown reply from gpg: [GNUPG:] IMPORT_OK 0 
F80E53CF88C23023BA25557B90B5DE66
[NOTICE] Import failed for: 0464E7E5.
Some keys could not be imported - continue anyway? [y/N]

Using sarge's gnupg etc,

Thanks,
--Jeroen

-- 
Jeroen van Wolffelaar
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (also for Jabber & MSN; ICQ: 33944357)
http://Jeroen.A-Eskwadraat.nl

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 321496-done) by bugs.debian.org; 18 Aug 2005 14:28:24 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Aug 18 07:28:24 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from triton.rz.uni-saarland.de [134.96.7.25] 
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
        id 1E5lNX-000865-00; Thu, 18 Aug 2005 07:28:23 -0700
Received: from cs.uni-sb.de (cs.uni-sb.de [134.96.254.254])
        by triton.rz.uni-saarland.de (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id 
j7IERnkR2229747
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 18 Aug 2005 16:27:50 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from mail.cs.uni-sb.de (mail.cs.uni-sb.de [134.96.254.200])
        by cs.uni-sb.de (8.13.4/2005033000) with ESMTP id j7IERnCY016186
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 18 Aug 2005 16:27:49 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from intertalk.cs.uni-sb.de (intertalk.cs.uni-sb.de [134.96.241.4])
        by mail.cs.uni-sb.de (8.13.4/2005060800) with ESMTP id j7IERmMp027569
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 18 Aug 2005 16:27:48 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by intertalk.cs.uni-sb.de (Postfix, from userid 1000)
        id ADC6B4AD51; Thu, 18 Aug 2005 16:27:57 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2005 16:27:57 +0200
From: Christoph Berg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#321496: caff doesn't understand gpg's IMPORT_OK
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mail-Followup-To: Christoph Berg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
        [EMAIL PROTECTED]
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
        protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="PNTmBPCT7hxwcZjr"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Debbugs-No-Ack: please
X-Face: ([EMAIL PROTECTED](D\O)J!Qu\q4fh8W^7WGqxpwTk&Xy0*ya<[EMAIL 
PROTECTED]/TA:l\Pde>wYj,M;75" 
N13_k}S.rS#lmX[G]QOuw[H"4#z$tSn$SkV<IurN'6;gkRFZw@/XLtl7":0v&kN3*-iM~q*;.*CfH@ 
qM>5ucV193Tz3IWj<]8at(6"K.ht//s"Ds,xMV9A\_bN/)[EMAIL PROTECTED]>-dF34Kw?,<G0ya
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-1.5.1 
(triton.rz.uni-saarland.de [134.96.7.25]); Thu, 18 Aug 2005 16:27:50 +0200 
(CEST)
X-AntiVirus: checked by AntiVir Milter 1.0.6; AVE 6.31.1.0; VDF 6.31.1.140
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-14.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER,
        HAS_PACKAGE,X_DEBBUGS_NO_ACK autolearn=ham 
        version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02


--PNTmBPCT7hxwcZjr
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Package: signing-party
Version: 0.4.2-1

Re: Peter Palfrader in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> tags 321496 pending
> thanks for all the fisheses

Fixed in 0.4.2-1; changelog updated.

Christoph
--=20
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.df7cb.de/cs/
Universit=E4t des Saarlandes, Compiler Design Lab

--PNTmBPCT7hxwcZjr
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFDBJrtxa93SlhRC1oRAg8EAKDIFRgmx/iSJTyHGFZA3DGrxlGLlQCgk0cB
t7IRkitrMRiBOSAdyM01Xi0=
=2Xy2
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--PNTmBPCT7hxwcZjr--


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to