Your message dated Thu, 18 Aug 2005 21:08:30 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#323833: sl-modem-daemon: Should be in main
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 18 Aug 2005 18:40:10 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Aug 18 11:40:10 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from glockenspiel.complete.org [69.10.152.57]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1E5pJC-0000vk-00; Thu, 18 Aug 2005 11:40:10 -0700
Received: from gatekeeper.excelhustler.com ([68.99.114.105]
helo=fritz.complete.org)
by glockenspiel.complete.org with esmtps
(with TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32)
(TLS peer CN fritz.complete.org, certificate verified)
(Exim 4.50)
id 1E5pJB-00013D-GE; Thu, 18 Aug 2005 13:40:12 -0500
Received: from jgoerzen by fritz.complete.org with local
(Exim 4.52)
id 1E5p3O-0000dY-2O; Thu, 18 Aug 2005 13:23:50 -0500
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: John Goerzen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: sl-modem-daemon: Should be in main
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.15
Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2005 13:23:49 -0500
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Virus-Scanned: by Exiscan on glockenspiel.complete.org at Thu, 18 Aug 2005
13:40:12 -0500
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Package: sl-modem-daemon
Version: 2.9.9d-5
Severity: normal
The license for this package looks like the standard 3-clause BSD; why
is it in non-free?
If it is in non-free because of what else is in the source package,
maybe you should split the source packages?
The README.debian says that "one part of the driver source is not
available". Yet the copyright file does not address this, and moreover,
that is for a kernel module -- and this package works fine with the ALSA
drivers.
I don't understand what the problem is presently with sl-modem-daemon.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.11.12
Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ISO-8859-1)
Versions of packages sl-modem-daemon depends on:
ii debconf 1.4.57 Debian configuration management sy
ii libasound2 1.0.9-3 ALSA library
ii libc6 2.3.5-3 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
sl-modem-daemon recommends no packages.
-- debconf information:
* sl-modem-daemon/country: USA
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 323833-done) by bugs.debian.org; 18 Aug 2005 19:08:34 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Aug 18 12:08:34 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mailgate1.uni-kl.de [131.246.120.5]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1E5pkg-0008Fz-00; Thu, 18 Aug 2005 12:08:34 -0700
Received: from debian.localnet (rotes255.wohnheim.uni-kl.de [131.246.178.65])
by mailgate1.uni-kl.de (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j7IJ8VV7010288;
Thu, 18 Aug 2005 21:08:31 +0200
Received: from inet by debian.localnet with local (Exim 4.52)
id 1E5pkc-0006KV-Ok; Thu, 18 Aug 2005 21:08:31 +0200
Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2005 21:08:30 +0200
From: Eduard Bloch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: John Goerzen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#323833: sl-modem-daemon: Should be in main
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.10i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
#include <hallo.h>
* John Goerzen [Thu, Aug 18 2005, 01:23:49PM]:
> Package: sl-modem-daemon
> Version: 2.9.9d-5
> Severity: normal
>
> The license for this package looks like the standard 3-clause BSD; why
> is it in non-free?
>
> If it is in non-free because of what else is in the source package,
> maybe you should split the source packages?
It has already been in contrib&main when I overlooked one of their
object files, and came back RSN.
> The README.debian says that "one part of the driver source is not
> available". Yet the copyright file does not address this, and moreover,
> that is for a kernel module -- and this package works fine with the ALSA
> drivers.
Ehm... and? "One part of the driver" != "One part of the kernel module".
The application _is_ the driver, at least the essential part of it.
> I don't understand what the problem is presently with sl-modem-daemon.
Because you do not trust my README.Debian and you did not look at the
source:
slmodemd: modem_main.o modem_cmdline.o $(modem-objs) $(dp-objs) dsplibs.o
$(sysdep-objs)
dsplibs.o: ELF 32-bit LSB relocatable, Intel 80386, version 1 (SYSV),
not stripped
Eduard.
--
<HE> Sehe ich das richtig? Keine DSAs seit 2 Tagen?
<Cord> Joey offline? ;-)
<HE> Ich habe Angst um Joey.
<HE> Joey: Gib ein Lebenszeichen, bitte. DSA, stable point release oder einfach
ein Rant reichen!
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
