Your message dated Thu, 18 Aug 2005 13:16:07 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line This bug is no longer relevant
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Apr 2004 23:06:33 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Apr 25 16:06:33 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from pd9590d07.dip.t-dialin.net (doubleshadow.hyperreal.org) 
[217.89.13.7] 
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1BHshk-0006Ci-00; Sun, 25 Apr 2004 16:06:33 -0700
Received: by doubleshadow.hyperreal.org (Mailhost)  with ESMTP id 
i3PN6Sp7019326; Mon, 26 Apr 2004 01:06:28 +0200
Received: by doubleshadow.hyperreal.org (Mailhost)  id i3PN6S0p019324; Mon, 26 
Apr 2004 01:06:28 +0200
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Lars Eilebrecht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: openoffice.org-bin: Prelink feature does not work (undefined symbol:
 gelf_getehdr)
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.56
Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2004 01:06:28 +0200
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 1

Package: openoffice.org-bin
Version: 1.1.1-2
Severity: normal

If the "prelink" feature for OpenOffice has been activated
setting up OpenOffice fails with the following error messages:

   Setting up openoffice.org-bin (1.1.1-2) ...
   Prelinking OpenOffice.org binaries... /usr/sbin/prelink: relocation error:
   /usr/sbin/prelink: undefined symbol: gelf_getehdr
   run-parts: /usr/share/openoffice.org-debian-files/hooks/postinst.d/prelink
   exited with return code 127

The most current prelink package for the testing release is
installed (0.0.20031029-3 ELF).


-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.4.18
Locale: LANG=C, [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Versions of packages openoffice.org-bin depends on:
ii  debconf                     1.3.22       Debian configuration management sy
ii  libart-2.0-2                2.3.16-1     Library of functions for 2D graphi
ii  libaudio2                   1.6-6        The Network Audio System (NAS). (s
ii  libc6                       2.3.2.ds1-10 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libcurl2                    7.11.1-1     Multi-protocol file transfer libra
ii  libdb3++c102                3.2.9-19     Berkeley v3 Database Libraries for
ii  libfontconfig1              2.2.1-13     generic font configuration library
ii  libfreetype6                2.1.7-1      FreeType 2 font engine, shared lib
ii  libgcc1                     1:3.3.3-5    GCC support library
ii  libmyspell3                 1:3.1-5      MySpell spellchecking library
ii  libstdc++5                  1:3.3.3-5    The GNU Standard C++ Library v3
ii  libxaw7                     4.1.0-8      X Athena widget set library
ii  openoffice.org              1.1.1-2      high-quality office productivity s
ii  xlibs                       4.2.1-12.1   X Window System client libraries
ii  zlib1g                      1:1.2.1-3    compression library - runtime

-- debconf information:
* openoffice.org-bin/prelink: true

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 245878-done) by bugs.debian.org; 18 Aug 2005 20:16:39 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Aug 18 13:16:39 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from smtp107.sbc.mail.mud.yahoo.com [68.142.198.206] 
        by spohr.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
        id 1E5qoZ-0004yG-00; Thu, 18 Aug 2005 13:16:39 -0700
Received: (qmail 11678 invoked from network); 18 Aug 2005 20:16:08 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO triplehelix.org) ([EMAIL PROTECTED]@68.126.216.211 
with login)
  by smtp107.sbc.mail.mud.yahoo.com with SMTP; 18 Aug 2005 20:16:08 -0000
Received: from darjeeling.triplehelix.org (tristan.wifi.triplehelix.org 
[192.168.0.2])
        by triplehelix.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56B932A9561
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 18 Aug 2005 13:16:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from joshk by darjeeling.triplehelix.org with local (Exim 3.36 #1 
(Debian))
        id 1E5qo3-00061U-00
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 18 Aug 2005 13:16:07 -0700
Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2005 13:16:07 -0700
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: This bug is no longer relevant
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
        protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="7AUc2qLy4jB3hD7Z"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.10i
From: Joshua Kwan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DSBL 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02


--7AUc2qLy4jB3hD7Z
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hello,

This bug is no longer relevant for two reasons:

1) prelink has depended on libelfg0 (>=3D 0.8.5-1) for a year, so it is
   now impossible to correctly install prelink without a compatible
   libelfg0. (In fact, the shlibs were fixed in the Debian package to
   add the requisite versioning.)
2) Transitional support for woody (now the 'oldstable' distribution) has
   been discontinued anyway.

Therefore, I'm closing this bug. Please reopen if this is disputed.

Thanks,

--=20
Joshua Kwan

--7AUc2qLy4jB3hD7Z
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: http://triplehelix.org/~joshk/pubkey_gpg.asc

iQIVAwUBQwTsh6OILr94RG8mAQJEGw/9HOw/JA9zWTycbJ5KxzEbpDkK5XpU9vOn
BLl/VtPPHm0vcBKmsN4oKcuXpZSQTbS7xn3Djh8budX+iOQt9BTNxyB+1kjRaAxj
HfMQGE+eEgDjc2NPfODunLhRH8wTbnCADo/2D8KN4yPsz0IyJqjvIASMW7b2QrLN
4xYJE0JtqluzTQLFMF7awnI58Bp2VEITe9FOvfrwm5LQl695UI1gnpwGx/StpX9D
nfOHwbzmFjXCdorQeZTaO724x0TOlCJRPSI/prypk8mrDvcs/7YN7GIjXWkqBKjn
mnGjJRCdJZpBE2CDmf3Rzhe/pnmngZxXONcZ6jE2YJGBDw9NEZET3nzhOa3kAZAp
LgK7KloJmlihxGJYYR+xHZt1lb+UtaX7YRbRvhI+f0Iy5fUbSrcpdpLdKsND5/BA
rQT/Fre8U/TBx9klsarvEOb3gEgZsIH7lM6m8NF1RkhryNIjMSz+kALppXjkBOj7
b0FYnMuHbaiG/jz9mwnT8U6I6rz1ulpFzUERk4/14cj4CX/qbIFe5nSGkjYiCHDR
KA/toynU0+3UuWKc/dPXWJ+QUD5A86AoQqaLvJ/CdC+C/5dRoAEgOCNkMX8RmUVD
6qktWw6oTWEYpeA3y0H/P4RUCzbHhVO/rD/1cDUHIuWA1W2NEjwRtnreUGEyIcbh
TFsXppQe450=
=aap4
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--7AUc2qLy4jB3hD7Z--


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to