Your message dated Fri, 19 Aug 2005 12:34:33 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Close OpenAFS FTBFS bugs for unsupported platforms
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Nov 2004 17:59:51 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Nov 10 09:59:51 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from dfw-gate2.raytheon.com [199.46.199.231]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1CRwl5-0008AD-00; Wed, 10 Nov 2004 09:59:51 -0800
Received: from ds02c00.directory.ray.com (ds02c00.directory.ray.com
[147.25.138.118])
by dfw-gate2.raytheon.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id iAAHxo0S004650
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 10 Nov 2004 11:59:50 -0600 (CST)
Received: from ds02c00 (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by ds02c00.directory.ray.com (Switch-3.1.4/Switch-3.1.0) with ESMTP id
iAAHxhZv007983
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 10 Nov 2004 17:59:43 GMT
Received: from ds02c00.directory.ray.com with LMTP by ds02c00
(2.0.6/sieved-2-0-build-559)
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 10 Nov 2004 17:59:43 +0000
Received: from loki (pcp181697pcs.msd.ray.com [199.46.173.56])
by ds02c00.directory.ray.com (Switch-3.1.4/Switch-3.1.0) with ESMTP id
iAAHxRWH007831
sender [EMAIL PROTECTED] for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 10 Nov 2004
17:59:27 GMT
Received: by loki (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id DE51413027A; Wed, 10 Nov 2004 11:59:19 -0600 (CST)
Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2004 11:59:19 -0600
From: Stephen R Marenka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: openafs_1.2.13-1(m68k/unstable/poseidon): FTBFS on m68k
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mail-Followup-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040818i
X-SPAM: 0.00
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
Package: openafs
Version: 1.2.13-1
Severity: important
Tags: sid
openafs fails to build from source on m68k.
Here are selected excerpts from the buildd log.
| Automatic build of openafs_1.2.13-1 on poseidon by sbuild/m68k 1.170.5
| Build started at 20041107-0122
| ******************************************************************************
[...]
| ** Using build dependencies supplied by package:
| Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 4.1.16), libncurses5-dev, libpam0g-dev, bison,
docbook-to-man, flex, autoconf, automake, perl, e2fslibs-dev
| **** Warning:
| **** The following central src deps are (probably) missing:
| kernel-package
[...]
| Checking correctness of source dependencies...
| Toolchain package versions: libc6-dev_2.3.2.ds1-18
linux-kernel-headers_2.5.999-test7-bk-17 gcc-3.3_1:3.3.5-2 g++-3.3_1:3.3.5-2
binutils_2.15-4 libstdc++5_1:3.3.5-2 libstdc++5-3.3-dev_1:3.3.5-2
[...]
| dpkg-source: extracting openafs in openafs-1.2.13
| dpkg-buildpackage: source package is openafs
| dpkg-buildpackage: source version is 1.2.13-1
| dpkg-buildpackage: host architecture is m68k
| /usr/bin/fakeroot debian/rules clean
| /bin/sh: /usr/src/linux/include/linux/version.h: No such file or directory
| dh_testdir
| dh_testroot
| rm -f build-stamp configure-stamp build-modules-stamp
| # Add here commands to clean up after the build process.
| make -ki distclean
| make[1]: Entering directory `/build/buildd/openafs-1.2.13'
| make[1]: *** No rule to make target `distclean'.
| make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/openafs-1.2.13'
| make: [clean] Error 2 (ignored)
| rm -rf obj dest ERROr: sysname not yet known @sys Makefile
debian/openafs-client.init
| rm -rf config.status config.cache lib include src/pic
| rm -f src/venus/livesys src/tests/Makefile src/tests/OpenAFS/DirPath.pm
| dh_clean
| debian/rules build
| /bin/sh: /usr/src/linux/include/linux/version.h: No such file or directory
| /bin/sh: /usr/src/linux/include/linux/version.h: No such file or directory
| /bin/sh: /usr/src/linux/include/linux/version.h: No such file or directory
| dh_testdir
| ln -s @sys/dest dest
| ln -s ERROr: sysname not yet known @sys
| ln: when making multiple links, last argument must be a directory
| make: [configure-stamp] Error 1 (ignored)
| afslogsdir=/var/log/openafs sh configure --with-afs-sysname=ERROr: sysname
not yet known --disable-kernel-module \
| --prefix=/usr --sysconfdir=/etc --libexecdir=/usr/lib \
| --localstatedir=/var/lib
| configure: WARNING: you should use --build, --host, --target
| configure: WARNING: you should use --build, --host, --target
| configure: WARNING: you should use --build, --host, --target
| configure: WARNING: you should use --build, --host, --target
| checking for a BSD-compatible install... /usr/bin/install -c
| checking whether build environment is sane... yes
| checking for gawk... no
| checking for mawk... mawk
| checking whether make sets $(MAKE)... yes
| checking for sysname-gcc... no
| checking for gcc... gcc
| checking for C compiler default output file name... a.out
| checking whether the C compiler works... yes
| checking whether we are cross compiling... no
| checking for suffix of executables...
| checking for suffix of object files... o
| checking whether we are using the GNU C compiler... yes
| checking whether gcc accepts -g... yes
| checking for gcc option to accept ANSI C... none needed
| checking for style of include used by make... GNU
| checking dependency style of gcc... none
| checking build system type... Invalid configuration `sysname': machine
`sysname' not recognized
| configure: error: /bin/sh ./config.sub sysname failed
| make: *** [configure-stamp] Error 1
| ******************************************************************************
| Build finished at 20041107-0210
| FAILED [dpkg-buildpackage died]
A full buildd log is available at
<http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?pkg=openafs&ver=1.2.13-1&arch=m68k>
Other buildd logs may be available at
<http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?arch=&pkg=openafs>
--
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right!
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 280643-done) by bugs.debian.org; 19 Aug 2005 19:34:35 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Aug 19 12:34:35 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from smtp1.stanford.edu [171.67.16.123]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1E6CdP-00022C-00; Fri, 19 Aug 2005 12:34:35 -0700
Received: from windlord.stanford.edu (windlord.Stanford.EDU [171.64.19.147])
by smtp1.Stanford.EDU (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j7JJYX8I023368;
Fri, 19 Aug 2005 12:34:34 -0700
Received: by windlord.stanford.edu (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 351F5E7CB5; Fri, 19 Aug 2005 12:34:33 -0700 (PDT)
From: Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Close OpenAFS FTBFS bugs for unsupported platforms
Organization: The Eyrie
Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2005 12:34:33 -0700
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) XEmacs/21.4.17 (linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Version: 1.3.87-1
I'm closing the bugs for mips and m68k FTBFS for openafs, since the
package now (as of 1.3.87-1) gives a much clearer error message saying
that those platforms aren't supported. Both of these bugs were opened, as
near as I can tell, by porters rather than by users who really wanted to
use OpenAFS on those platforms, and I don't expect upstream to ever
support them.
I've sent mail to have Packages-arch-specific updated so that the buildds
won't try the package.
If anyone really does want to use OpenAFS on mips or m68k, feel free to
reopen the appropriate bug (or open another one), but be aware that it
will probably end up getting tagged wontfix unless you can also do the
kernel port.
--
Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
