Your message dated Sun, 21 Aug 2005 17:06:30 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line fixed in stable
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Feb 2003 14:15:27 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Feb 04 08:15:26 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from anchor-post-31.mail.demon.net [194.217.242.89] 
        by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
        id 18g3rC-0006WZ-00; Tue, 04 Feb 2003 08:15:26 -0600
Received: from lfix.demon.co.uk ([158.152.59.127] helo=linda.lfix.co.uk)
        by anchor-post-31.mail.demon.net with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1)
        id 18g3r8-000DKS-0V
        for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 04 Feb 2003 14:15:22 +0000
Received: from olly by linda.lfix.co.uk with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
        id 18g3qx-0004sO-00; Tue, 04 Feb 2003 14:15:11 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Oliver Elphick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: net-tools: ifconfig.8 page omits multiple IPs on one interface
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.10
Date: Tue, 04 Feb 2003 14:15:11 +0000
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.6 required=5.0
        tests=SPAM_PHRASE_00_01
        version=2.41
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: net-tools
Version: 1.60-4
Severity: normal


It is possible to assign multiple IP addresses to a single interface, like
this:

ifconfig eth0:0 217.158.112.194 netmask 255.255.255.224
ifconfig eth0:1 217.158.112.195 netmask 255.255.255.224

The ifconfig manpage does not mention this, nor can I find it documented
anywhere, except for a passing mention in interfaces.5.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux linda 2.4.20smp #1 SMP Sun Dec 22 14:09:11 GMT 2002 i686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C

Versions of packages net-tools depends on:
ii  libc6                         2.3.1-10   GNU C Library: Shared libraries an

-- no debconf information


---------------------------------------
Received: (at 179780-done) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Aug 2005 15:06:35 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Aug 21 08:06:35 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from quechua.inka.de (mail.inka.de) [193.197.184.2] (mail)
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
        id 1E6rP9-0006b6-00; Sun, 21 Aug 2005 08:06:35 -0700
Received: from calista.eckenfels.6bone.ka-ip.net (p54a33c53.dip0.t-ipconnect.de 
[84.163.60.83])
        by mail.inka.de with asmtp 
        id 1E6rP6-0000c8-00; Sun, 21 Aug 2005 17:06:32 +0200
Received: from ecki by calista.eckenfels.6bone.ka-ip.net with local   (Exim 
3.35 #1 (Debian))
        id 1E6rP4-0006R3-00; Sun, 21 Aug 2005 17:06:30 +0200
Date: Sun, 21 Aug 2005 17:06:30 +0200
From: Bernd Eckenfels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: fixed in stable
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
Sender: Bernd Eckenfels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.8 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

man page describes alias interfaces briefly now


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to