Your message dated Tue, 23 Aug 2005 22:17:38 +1000
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line #204053 fixed by xprint dependencies
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Aug 2003 05:25:13 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Aug 04 00:25:11 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from (e2.martoq) [200.72.213.218]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 19jXqJ-0006By-00; Mon, 04 Aug 2003 00:25:11 -0500
Received: from aldrin by e2.martoq with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 19jXqD-0002RY-00
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 04 Aug 2003 01:25:05 -0400
Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2003 01:25:05 -0400
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: init.d script should be in xprt package, not xprt-common
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
From: Aldrin Martoq <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0
tests=BAYES_30,HAS_PACKAGE,USER_AGENT_MUTT
version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_07_20
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_07_20
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)
Package: xprt
Version: 4.2.1-9
Severity: minor
*** Please type your report below this line ***
Hi,
I've removed "xprt" from my system, however the
/etc/init.d/xprint is still there because it belongs to "xprt-common"
package (which is kind of weird, because there is no Xprt binary, and an
error message appears during upgrade).
Starting Xprint servers: Xprt.
/etc/init.d/xprint: ## ERROR: Can't find "/usr/X11R6/bin/Xprt".
The bottom line is that if I install the Xprint support I should
also install the server, which is wrong IMHO. Please move everything
related to Xprt server to the xprt package.
Thanks,
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux a 2.4.20-3-k7 #1 Sun Jul 27 21:10:39 EST 2003 i686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C
Versions of packages xprt depends on:
ii libc6 2.3.1-17 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii xprt-common 0.0.8.cvs20030508-5 Xprint - the X11 print system (con
ii zlib1g 1:1.1.4-14 compression library - runtime
-- no debconf information
--
Aldrin
"IF A PCKT hts a pocket on a scket on a port, & da bus is int'ed as a verylast
resort, & da addr o'da mem makes y flppy dsk abort, then da scket pckt pocket
has an error 2 report!" -- Dr. Suess as a Network Wizard
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 204053-done) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Aug 2005 12:17:43 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Aug 23 05:17:43 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from smta07.mail.ozemail.net [203.103.165.110]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1E7Xio-0001x9-00; Tue, 23 Aug 2005 05:17:42 -0700
Received: from pug.anu.edu.au ([203.103.48.11]) by smta07.mail.ozemail.net
with ESMTP
id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
Tue, 23 Aug 2005 12:17:40 +0000
Received: from drew by pug.anu.edu.au with local (Exim 4.52)
id 1E7Xik-00022d-KI
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 23 Aug 2005 22:17:38 +1000
Subject: #204053 fixed by xprint dependencies
From: Drew Parsons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Organization: The Debian Project
Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2005 22:17:38 +1000
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.3
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
xprint and xprint-common are currently more tightly coupled, so that if
you remove xprint, xprint-common is removed as well.
The reason /etc/init.d/xprint is in xprint-common is because this
package is treated as the arch-independent part of Xprint, while xprint
contains only the binaries (and man pages). Moreover, /etc/init.d/xprint
could be edited to use a different Xprt server than the one provided by
the xprint package.
Closing the bug, since it has been address by the package Dependencies.
Drew
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
