Your message dated Tue, 23 Aug 2005 13:00:34 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#324644: e2fsprogs: packaged as native package
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Aug 2005 08:58:44 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Aug 23 01:58:44 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from c5100bc63.inet.catch.no (vawad.err.no) [81.0.188.99]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1E7UcF-0005ld-00; Tue, 23 Aug 2005 01:58:44 -0700
Received: from c5100bc62.inet.catch.no ([81.0.188.98] helo=thosu.err.no)
by vawad.err.no with esmtp (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_3DES_EDE_CBC_SHA:24)
(Exim 4.34)
id 1E7UcC-0004rR-2U
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 23 Aug 2005 10:58:42 +0200
Received: by thosu.err.no (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id C76F157894; Tue, 23 Aug 2005 10:58:19 +0200 (CEST)
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: e2fsprogs: packaged as native package
Mail-Copies-To: never
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: Tollef Fog Heen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Organization: Private
Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2005 10:58:19 +0200
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Debian Bug Tracking System's message of "Tue,
23 Aug 2005 01:33:08 -0700")
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.1007 (Gnus v5.10.7) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Package: e2fsprogs
Hi,
it seems like e2fsprogs_1.38-2 was accidentially packaged as a native
package.
Also, just using the original .orig.tar.gz is a bit problematic, due
to the addition of tests/f_bad_disconnected_inode/image.gz
--
Tollef Fog Heen ,''`.
UNIX is user friendly, it's just picky about who its friends are : :' :
`. `'
`-
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 324644-done) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Aug 2005 17:01:04 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Aug 23 10:01:04 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from thunk.org (thunker.thunk.org) [69.25.196.29]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1E7c92-0001uS-00; Tue, 23 Aug 2005 10:01:04 -0700
Received: from root (helo=think.thunk.org)
by thunker.thunk.org with local-esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 1E7c8p-0000gZ-00; Tue, 23 Aug 2005 13:00:51 -0400
Received: from tytso by think.thunk.org with local (Exim 4.52)
id 1E7c8Y-0000X9-UK; Tue, 23 Aug 2005 13:00:34 -0400
Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2005 13:00:34 -0400
From: Theodore Ts'o <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Tollef Fog Heen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#324644: e2fsprogs: packaged as native package
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
On Tue, Aug 23, 2005 at 03:43:49PM +0200, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> * Theodore Ts'o
>
> | That's _why_ e2fsprogs 1.38-2 was intentially packaged as a native
> | package.... dpkg-source is broken with respect to changed source
> | trees that contain binary files.
>
> Ok; feel free to close the bug, then. (Or do the uuencode/decode
> workaround, but it's ugly so if you can avoid it, it's nicer, IMO).
What I'll be doing shortly is to release a work-in-progress release of
e2fsprogs upstream, and that will give us a .tar.gz file that we can
use as a base that won't require a binary file diff.
Normally when this happens I just avoid uploading a new version of
e2fsprogs, but given the important/grave bug where e2fsprogs would
core dump on certain filesystem corruptions, I decided it was more
important to upload an updated version.
- Ted
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
