Your message dated Wed, 24 Aug 2005 11:46:27 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#324723: hdparm: Move /etc/hdparm.conf under /etc/<package>/
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Aug 2005 16:54:33 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Aug 23 09:54:33 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from fep32-0.kolumbus.fi (fep32-app.kolumbus.fi) [193.229.0.63]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1E7c2j-0000Fb-00; Tue, 23 Aug 2005 09:54:33 -0700
Received: from bongo.cante.net ([81.197.3.110]) by fep32-app.kolumbus.fi
with ESMTP
id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 23 Aug 2005 19:54:31 +0300
Received: from ns2.cante.net ([192.168.1.3] helo=cante)
by bongo.cante.net with esmtp (Exim 4.52)
id 1E7c2h-000711-HI; Tue, 23 Aug 2005 19:54:31 +0300
Received: from jaalto by cante with local (Exim 4.52)
id 1E7c2f-0004o1-IZ; Tue, 23 Aug 2005 19:54:29 +0300
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Jari Aalto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: hdparm: Move /etc/hdparm.conf under /etc/<package>/
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.15
Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2005 19:54:29 +0300
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Package: hdparm
Version: 6.1-5
Severity: minor
The /etc hierarchy is quite polluted with various configuration files.
It would be better if packages kept configuration files under their
own directories (easier for backups etc.).
Please move /etc/hdparm.conf => /etc/<package>/config or
/etc/<package>/hdparm.conf
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.12-1-686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ISO-8859-1) (ignored: LC_ALL set to en_US)
Versions of packages hdparm depends on:
ii libc6 2.3.5-4 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii lsb-base 3.0-5 Linux Standard Base 3.0 init scrip
hdparm recommends no packages.
-- no debconf information
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 324723-done) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Aug 2005 15:46:29 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Aug 24 08:46:29 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from (mail.lobefin.net) [216.158.52.10] (Debian-exim)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1E7xSP-0001xX-00; Wed, 24 Aug 2005 08:46:29 -0700
Received: from lobefin.net
([216.158.52.108] helo=www.lobefin.net ident=Debian-exim)
by mail.lobefin.net with asmtp (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA:16)
(Exim 4.34)
id 1E7xSO-0006xk-Ou; Wed, 24 Aug 2005 11:46:28 -0400
Received: from steve by www.lobefin.net with local (Exim 4.50)
id 1E7xSN-0005A1-L0; Wed, 24 Aug 2005 11:46:27 -0400
Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2005 11:46:27 -0400
From: Stephen Gran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Jari Aalto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#324723: hdparm: Move /etc/hdparm.conf under /etc/<package>/
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="aVD9QWMuhilNxW9f"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Editor: VIM - Vi IMproved 6.3
X-OS: Linux hadrian 2.6.8-2-686-smp i686
X-Uptime: 74 days
X-Latin: Hodie nono Kalendas Septembres MMDCCLVIII ab urbe condita est
X-Date: Today is Sweetmorn, the 17th day of Bureaucracy in the YOLD 3171
X-DDate: Only 2431005 Shopping Days Left Before X-Day. Keep the Lasagna flying!
X-Motto: debian/rules
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
X-Authenticated-Sender: steve
X-Scanned-By: ClamAV at mail.lobefin.net
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
--aVD9QWMuhilNxW9f
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
This one time, at band camp, Jari Aalto said:
> | Now, what to do with the bug report? It appears to me that policy says
> | to put files in /etc, and make a subdirectory if there are many. Since
> | the second part does not apply, I am inclined to say I'm following
> | policy pretty much exactly, and just close the report. However, I will
> | wait to hear from you.
>=20
> It was suggested that this is discussed further in debian-devel, so you
> can close the bug for now.=20
OK, closing now.
--=20
-----------------------------------------------------------------
| ,''`. Stephen Gran |
| : :' : [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
| `. `' Debian user, admin, and developer |
| `- http://www.debian.org |
-----------------------------------------------------------------
--aVD9QWMuhilNxW9f
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFDDJZTSYIMHOpZA44RAk5FAJ95TWW3kSlPapxyEkV3FWH7vGXNNACg3bnW
D4o5M+UIWKR0TOSio23Ol5E=
=8Mzy
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--aVD9QWMuhilNxW9f--
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
