Your message dated Thu, 25 Aug 2005 22:16:00 +1000
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#324971: do not include licence text for common-licenses
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Aug 2005 08:16:43 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Aug 25 01:16:43 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from armagnac.ifi.unizh.ch (albatross.madduck.net) [130.60.75.72]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1E8Cug-0002zm-00; Thu, 25 Aug 2005 01:16:43 -0700
Received: from localhost (albatross.madduck.net [127.0.0.1])
by albatross.madduck.net (postfix) with ESMTP id D13498E8362
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 25 Aug 2005 10:16:38 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from albatross.madduck.net ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (albatross.madduck.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port
10024)
with LMTP id 23790-01-7 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
Thu, 25 Aug 2005 10:16:38 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from cirrus.madduck.net (84-72-21-69.dclient.hispeed.ch [84.72.21.69])
(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(Client CN "cirrus.madduck.net", Issuer "madduck.net CA" (verified OK))
by albatross.madduck.net (postfix) with ESMTP id AC0268E834F
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 25 Aug 2005 10:16:38 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by cirrus.madduck.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 5714720434C; Thu, 25 Aug 2005 10:16:37 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2005 10:16:37 +0200
From: martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: do not include licence text for common-licenses
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="LQksG6bCIzRHxTLp"
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Reportbug-Version: 3.15
Organization: Debian GNU/Linux
X-OS: Debian GNU/Linux 3.1 kernel 2.6.12-cirrus i686
X-Motto: Keep the good times rollin'
X-Subliminal-Message: debian/rules!
X-Debbugs-No-Ack: please spare me
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at madduck.net
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-11.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,
X_DEBBUGS_NO_ACK autolearn=ham version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
--LQksG6bCIzRHxTLp
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Package: dh-make
Version: 0.38
Severity: minor
Re: http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/08/msg00011.html
- Do not include a license that is in /usr/share/common-licenses into
your debian/copyright. That's a waste of space.
Yet all the files in /usr/share/debhelper/dh_make/license seem to do
so.
--=20
.''`. martin f. krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
: :' : proud Debian developer and author: http://debiansystem.info
`. `'`
`- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing a system
=20
Invalid/expired PGP (sub)keys? Use subkeys.pgp.net as keyserver!
=20
"a man's very highest moment is, i have no doubt at all, when he
kneels in the dust, and beats his breast, and tells all the sins of
his life."
-- oscar wilde
--LQksG6bCIzRHxTLp
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature (GPG/PGP)
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFDDX5lIgvIgzMMSnURAsSWAKCOA2jGbW5rL6pzwPzskkNf7M0YsACg5OH9
8EHJvQB+Y50mQxCmyQAnyPY=
=73A/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--LQksG6bCIzRHxTLp--
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 324971-done) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Aug 2005 12:16:03 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Aug 25 05:16:03 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from ppp114-209.static.internode.on.net (mail.enc.com.au)
[150.101.114.209]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1E8GeJ-00054w-00; Thu, 25 Aug 2005 05:16:03 -0700
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by mail.enc.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9AF9FB7C45;
Thu, 25 Aug 2005 22:16:00 +1000 (EST)
Received: from mail.enc.com.au ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (gonzo [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP
id 32321-05; Thu, 25 Aug 2005 22:16:00 +1000 (EST)
Received: by mail.enc.com.au (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 5BDFFB9A21; Thu, 25 Aug 2005 22:16:00 +1000 (EST)
Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2005 22:16:00 +1000
To: martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#324971: do not include licence text for common-licenses
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Craig Small)
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at enc.com.au
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
On Thu, Aug 25, 2005 at 10:16:37AM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
> Re: http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/08/msg00011.html
>
> - Do not include a license that is in /usr/share/common-licenses into
> your debian/copyright. That's a waste of space.
>
> Yet all the files in /usr/share/debhelper/dh_make/license seem to do
> so.
They don't, have a closer look at them. 157 Vs 2698 words. They are
merely pointers to the license.
If that's not enough to convince you, go up two points in the URL you
mentioned and also click on the link it references.
Of course those some of those submitters on the list appear to be
confused about what should and should not go in there. The main point
anyway is the license is not in those templates.
- Craig
--
Craig Small GnuPG:1C1B D893 1418 2AF4 45EE 95CB C76C E5AC 12CA DFA5
Eye-Net Consulting http://www.enc.com.au/ MIEE Debian developer
csmall at : enc.com.au ieee.org debian.org
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
