Your message dated Sun, 28 Aug 2005 04:32:05 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#324648: fixed in pbuilder 0.130
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Aug 2005 09:14:17 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Aug 23 02:14:17 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from cpe-60-224-190-58.vic.bigpond.net.au (nukak.apana.org.au) 
[60.224.190.58] 
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
        id 1E7UrJ-0004Bm-00; Tue, 23 Aug 2005 02:14:17 -0700
Received: by nukak.apana.org.au (Postfix, from userid 1000)
        id AB794684397; Tue, 23 Aug 2005 19:14:12 +1000 (EST)
Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2005 19:14:12 +1000
From: Anibal Monsalve Salazar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: pbuilder: should depend on cdebootstrap
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
        protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="CblX+4bnyfN0pR09"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02


--CblX+4bnyfN0pR09
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline

Package: pbuilder
Version: 0.129
Severity: important


ikari:~# pbuilder create --distribution sarge
Distribution is sarge.
Building the build environment
 -> running cdebootstrap
/usr/lib/pbuilder/pbuilder-createbuildenv: line 57: cdebootstrap: command not 
found
pbuilder: cdebootstrap failed
 -> Aborting with an error
 -> cleaning the build env
    -> removing directory /var/cache/pbuilder/build//5195 and its subdirectories


Anibal Monsalve Salazar
--
 .''`. Debian GNU/Linux
: :' : Free Operating System
`. `'  http://debian.org/
  `-   http://v7w.com/anibal

--CblX+4bnyfN0pR09
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFDCujjgY5NIXPNpFURAvLvAJ4iDSJkNvHOdQetLKtW5XWWVoWb5gCeKzJl
cR/+YuZ+vy2aKPZZGVGseoU=
=SMAx
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--CblX+4bnyfN0pR09--

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 324648-close) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Aug 2005 11:38:06 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Aug 28 04:38:06 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
        id 1E9LOP-0005bM-00; Sun, 28 Aug 2005 04:32:05 -0700
From: Junichi Uekawa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#324648: fixed in pbuilder 0.130
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 28 Aug 2005 04:32:05 -0700
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2

Source: pbuilder
Source-Version: 0.130

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
pbuilder, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

pbuilder_0.130.dsc
  to pool/main/p/pbuilder/pbuilder_0.130.dsc
pbuilder_0.130.tar.gz
  to pool/main/p/pbuilder/pbuilder_0.130.tar.gz
pbuilder_0.130_all.deb
  to pool/main/p/pbuilder/pbuilder_0.130_all.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Junichi Uekawa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated pbuilder package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 28 Aug 2005 13:00:38 +0900
Source: pbuilder
Binary: pbuilder
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.130
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Junichi Uekawa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Junichi Uekawa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description: 
 pbuilder   - personal package builder for Debian packages
Closes: 323843 324648 325184
Changes: 
 pbuilder (0.130) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * depend on cdebootstrap, and suggest debootstrap. You may alternatively use
     debootstrap, but the default is cdebootstrap.
     (closes: #323843, #324648)
   * cowdancer support improvement -- now passes testsuite.
   * Standards-version: 3.6.2
   * SHELL=/bin/bash is now exported in default configuration;
     since setting that to 'zsh' and others will not always work
     inside the chroot
     (closes: #325184)
Files: 
 8e082874bfb888fc8c6fb50c867c031b 557 devel extra pbuilder_0.130.dsc
 ac743303b913e6ee0280570151fba49d 275245 devel extra pbuilder_0.130.tar.gz
 5abcbb883ee662adfb176e792e48cbd6 69388 devel extra pbuilder_0.130_all.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFDEZ0vgY5NIXPNpFURAv4HAJ9ZeVrIF5Jm1TJEaWS3V3xOKmAsjQCeKYVa
if8uGl09X5oXo2bPSPuSgIY=
=hbny
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to