Your message dated Mon, 29 Aug 2005 10:27:42 +1000
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#204014: Xprint memory now under control
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 3 Aug 2003 18:52:00 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Aug 03 13:51:54 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from 52.c1bccf.client.atlantech.net (Maxwell.local) [207.188.193.82] 
        by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 19jNxP-0007gz-00; Sun, 03 Aug 2003 13:51:51 -0500
Received: from bohr.local ([2001:470:1f00:595:2a0:c9ff:feee:b4cb] 
helo=bohr.home)
        by Maxwell.local with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
        id 19jNxO-0007mx-00; Sun, 03 Aug 2003 14:51:50 -0400
Received: from anthony by bohr.home with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
        id 19jNxN-0003jR-00; Sun, 03 Aug 2003 14:51:49 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
From: Anthony DeRobertis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Printing certain page uses insane memory
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.19
Date: Sun, 03 Aug 2003 14:51:49 -0400
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Anthony DeRobertis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-11.7 required=4.0
        tests=BAYES_10,HAS_PACKAGE,PGP_SIGNATURE
        autolearn=ham version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_07_20
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_07_20 
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)

Package: xprt-xprintorg
Version: 0.0.8.cvs20030508-3
Severity: normal
Tags: security

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

I tried to print http://nago.AnimeMusicVideos.org/ from Mozilla w/
xprint. The Xprt server started gobbling memory without bounds; at
around 700M the OOM killer took out mozilla, and then Xprt crashed.

- -- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux bohr 2.4.20-bohr #1 SMP Sat Mar 22 10:27:31 EST 2003 i686
Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US

Versions of packages xprt-xprintorg depends on:
ii  libc6                2.3.1-16            GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  xlibs                4.2.1-6             X Window System client libraries
ii  xprt-common          0.0.8.cvs20030508-3 Xprint - the X11 print system (con

- -- no debconf information

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE/LVnF+z+IwlXqWf4RAlMTAKCAlfzMa5Mlpv7uBPmhfssZOEUsIQCgjVw0
HO+EmQfacXkkArFMpP/8CGQ=
=zUSq
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 204014-done) by bugs.debian.org; 29 Aug 2005 00:27:46 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Aug 28 17:27:46 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from smta09.mail.ozemail.net [203.103.165.130] 
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
        id 1E9XV4-0006l9-00; Sun, 28 Aug 2005 17:27:46 -0700
Received: from pug.anu.edu.au ([150.203.181.71]) by smta09.mail.ozemail.net
          with ESMTP
          id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
          Mon, 29 Aug 2005 00:27:44 +0000
Received: from drew by pug.anu.edu.au with local (Exim 4.52)
        id 1E9XV1-00024D-M1; Mon, 29 Aug 2005 10:27:43 +1000
Subject: Re: Bug#204014: Xprint memory now under control
From: Drew Parsons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], Anthony DeRobertis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
         <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Organization: The Debian Project
Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2005 10:27:42 +1000
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.3 
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

On Sun, 2005-08-28 at 14:05 -0400, Anthony DeRobertis wrote:
> Drew Parsons wrote:
> 
> > Memory usage seems fine now, never more than 22MB. Postscript output
> > looks a bit dodgy, mind you, but that's a separate question.
> 
> Seems fine now. Thank you.

Great.  Thanks for the feedback!

Drew


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to