Your message dated Tue, 20 Jul 2010 07:53:57 -0400
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line On futher research ...
has caused the Debian Bug report #581258,
regarding d-shlibs: typo of the dynamic load library prevents build-dependent
packages from building
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
581258: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=581258
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: d-shlibs
Version: 0.41
Severity: important
Tags: patch
User: [email protected]
Usertags: origin-ubuntu maverick ubuntu-patch
In Ubuntu, we've applied the attached patch to achieve the following:
* Correct a typo on the glibc-2.10 armel dynamic loader so d-devlibdeps
works on armel properly (LP: #504365)
We thought you might be interested in doing the same.
Downstream bug report:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/d-shlibs/+bug/504365
-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
APT prefers lucid-updates
APT policy: (500, 'lucid-updates'), (500, 'lucid-security'), (500, 'lucid')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-21-generic (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.utf8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
=== modified file 'd-devlibdeps'
--- d-devlibdeps 2009-09-29 23:26:36 +0000
+++ d-devlibdeps 2010-05-12 03:28:47 +0000
@@ -108,7 +108,7 @@
-e 's/libxml2-2-dev/libxml2-dev/' \
-e 's/libgthread-2.0-0-dev/libglib2.0-dev/' \
-e 's/libstdc++6-dev/libstdc++6-4.1-dev/' \
- -e 's/ld-linux3-dev-dev//' \
+ -e 's/ld-linux3-dev//' \
"${overri...@]/#/-e}" \
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
So I had an opportunity to look at this again, and I agree that this patch is
invalid and we're looking at reconfirming this is broken and reverting the
diversion in Ubuntu. I apologize for the noise, and I'm closing this bug
Michael
--- End Message ---
