Your message dated Thu, 05 Aug 2010 18:25:04 +0200
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#591496: python2.6-minimal: site-packages symlink?
has caused the Debian Bug report #591496,
regarding python2.6-minimal: site-packages symlink?
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)


-- 
591496: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=591496
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: python2.6-minimal
Version: 2.6.5+20100706-1
Severity: normal

Related to #568195 & #587606.

The following output from those bugs is well-known:

Selecting previously deselected package python2.6-minimal.
Unpacking python2.6-minimal (from 
.../python2.6-minimal_2.6.5+20100730-1_amd64.deb) ...
new installation of python2.6-minimal; /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages is a 
directory
which is expected a symlink to /usr/local/lib/python2.6/dist-packages.
please find the package shipping files in /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages and
file a bug report to ship these in /usr/lib/python2.6/dist-packages instead
aborting installation of python2.6-minimal


...but after installing python2.6-minimal in a chroot,
/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages does not exist, not even as symlink.
Shouldn't this link be created when python is installed?

-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.35-rc6-aufs (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=fi_FI.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fi_FI.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

Versions of packages python2.6-minimal depends on:
ii  libc6                   2.11.2-2         Embedded GNU C Library: Shared lib
ii  libssl0.9.8             0.9.8o-1         SSL shared libraries
ii  zlib1g                  1:1.2.3.4.dfsg-3 compression library - runtime

Versions of packages python2.6-minimal recommends:
ii  python2.6               2.6.5+20100706-1 An interactive high-level object-o

Versions of packages python2.6-minimal suggests:
ii  binfmt-support                1.2.18     Support for extra binary formats

-- no debconf information



--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- The code to move site-packages around is now disabled. No, site-packages shouldn't exist in python2.6's sys.path.

  Matthias

On 03.08.2010 17:37, Edward J. Shornock wrote:
Package: python2.6-minimal
Version: 2.6.5+20100706-1
Severity: normal

Related to #568195&  #587606.

The following output from those bugs is well-known:

Selecting previously deselected package python2.6-minimal.
Unpacking python2.6-minimal (from 
.../python2.6-minimal_2.6.5+20100730-1_amd64.deb) ...
new installation of python2.6-minimal; /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages is a 
directory
which is expected a symlink to /usr/local/lib/python2.6/dist-packages.
please find the package shipping files in /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages and
file a bug report to ship these in /usr/lib/python2.6/dist-packages instead
aborting installation of python2.6-minimal


...but after installing python2.6-minimal in a chroot,
/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages does not exist, not even as symlink.
Shouldn't this link be created when python is installed?


--- End Message ---

Reply via email to