Your message dated Sun, 12 Sep 2010 15:10:04 +0000
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Package caudium has been removed from Debian
has caused the Debian Bug report #579242,
regarding caudium-pixsl: Typo in package description
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
579242: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=579242
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: caudium-pixsl
Severity: minor
In the package description:
Certain parts of Caudium are coded in C for speed. This package contains
the compiled shared extension module that provides Caudium with
XSLT support.
"compiled shared" --> "compiled shared" (remove double space)
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 5.0.4
APT prefers stable
APT policy: (500, 'stable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.26-2-686 (SMP w/1 CPU core)
Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Versions of packages caudium-pixsl depends on:
pn caudium <none> (no description available)
ii libc6 2.7-18lenny2 GNU C Library: Shared libraries
ii libexpat1 2.0.1-4+lenny3 XML parsing C library - runtime li
pn libsablot0 <none> (no description available)
pn pike7.6 <none> (no description available)
pn pike7.6-core <none> (no description available)
caudium-pixsl recommends no packages.
caudium-pixsl suggests no packages.
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 3:1.4.12-12+rm
You filed the bug http://bugs.debian.org/579242 in Debian BTS
against the package caudium. I'm closing it at *unstable*, but it will
remain open for older distributions.
For more information about this package's removal, read
http://bugs.debian.org/596378. That bug might give the reasons why
this package was removed and suggestions of possible replacements.
Don't hesitate to reply to this mail if you have any question.
Thank you for your contribution to Debian.
--
Luca Falavigna
--- End Message ---
