Your message dated Sat, 3 Sep 2005 22:48:17 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#280393: bogofilter/gsl/uml
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Nov 2004 05:19:42 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Nov 08 21:19:42 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from li4-87.members.linode.com (www.mattrope.com) [66.220.1.87]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1CROPu-0000PO-00; Mon, 08 Nov 2004 21:19:42 -0800
Received: from mattrope by www.mattrope.com with local (Exim 4.34)
id 1CROPp-0002kM-6R; Mon, 08 Nov 2004 21:19:37 -0800
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Matt Roper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: bogofilter: Bogofilter occasionally crashes with GSL errors
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.63
Date: Mon, 08 Nov 2004 21:19:35 -0800
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Matt Roper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: <locally generated>
X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on www.mattrope.com); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
Package: bogofilter
Version: 0.92.8-1
Severity: important
Over the last couple months I've occasionally run into a problem where
bogofilter will crash with the following message when processing an
email:
gsl: gamma_inc.c:233: ERROR: error in CF for F(a,x)
Default GSL error handler invoked.
Aborted
This error doesn't occur on every message; probably less than 1 out of
every 1000 messages has this problem. I've noticed that occasionally a
message which has been stuck in my mail queue for a while because of
this problem will somehow make it through without encountering this
error, which strikes me as very strange. I thought my wordlists might
be corrupt, so I moved them out of the way and created new ones, but
that didn't make a difference.
Looking back through my procmail logs, it appears that this problem
first appeared back in June. I haven't seen this bug reported anywhere
else, so there must be something unique about my system. The only thing
I can think of that's even remotely unique is that I'm running under
user-mode linux rather than a true kernel, but I don't see how that
could affect this.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.4.26-linode31-1um
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C
Versions of packages bogofilter depends on:
ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-18 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii libdb4.2 4.2.52-17 Berkeley v4.2 Database Libraries [
ii libgsl0 1.5-2 The GNU Scientific Library (GSL) -
-- no debconf information
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 280393-done) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Sep 2005 02:48:18 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Sep 03 19:48:18 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from acolyte.scowler.net [216.254.112.45]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EBkYM-000225-00; Sat, 03 Sep 2005 19:48:18 -0700
Received: by acolyte.scowler.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 6A93870055; Sat, 3 Sep 2005 22:48:17 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Sat, 3 Sep 2005 22:48:17 -0400
From: Clint Adams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Matt Roper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#280393: bogofilter/gsl/uml
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
> I was never able to reproduce the error on a non-UML system, so I'm
> pretty sure the problem was either caused or triggered by UML. I never
> did figure out whether the bug was in bogofilter/GSL or in UML, but I
> haven't encountered the problem in quite a while now, so I suspect that
> the issue has been solved by upgrades of one or both pieces of software.
> The problem was so sporadic and unpredictable that I can't pinpoint a
> specific upgrade that solved the problem (and I don't have control over
> the physical machine that my UML instance was running on, so I can't
> experiment much). Anyway, I think the issue is solved now. Sorry I
> can't give more detailed information, but thanks for your help.
Closing. Reopen if it recurs.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
