Your message dated Wed, 15 Sep 2010 08:42:48 +0200
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#596682: ufw fails to start with kernel 2.6.35
has caused the Debian Bug report #596682,
regarding ufw fails to start with kernel 2.6.35
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
596682: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=596682
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: ufw
Version: 0.30.0-2
Severity: normal
ufw fails to load /etc/ufw/before.rules at boot time,
with kernel 2.6.35. It works with kernel 2.6.32.
invoke-rc.d ufw restart
works after boot.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.35-trunk-686 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Versions of packages ufw depends on:
ii debconf [debconf-2.0] 1.5.35 Debian configuration management sy
ii iptables 1.4.9-1 administration tools for packet fi
ii python 2.6.6-1 interactive high-level object-orie
ii python-central 0.6.16 register and build utility for Pyt
ii ucf 3.0025+nmu1 Update Configuration File: preserv
ufw recommends no packages.
Versions of packages ufw suggests:
ii rsyslog 4.6.4-1 enhanced multi-threaded syslogd
-- debconf information:
* ufw/enable: true
* ufw/existing_configuration:
ufw/oldrules:
ufw/allow_known_ports:
ufw/allow_custom_ports:
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Very weird.
The problem has been fixed somehow (with both sysvrc and systemd).
I've seen it for weeks, and now that i open a bug, it closes itself :)
The only upgraded package i could think of would be python 2.6.6-3 -> 2.6.6-4.
Closing.
Jérémy.
--- End Message ---
