Your message dated Sun, 04 Sep 2005 07:47:03 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#326580: fixed in raidutils 0.0.4-7
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Sep 2005 08:56:34 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Sep 04 01:56:34 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from blars.org (renig.nat.blars.org) [64.81.35.59]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EBqIk-0001cr-00; Sun, 04 Sep 2005 01:56:34 -0700
Received: from quaff.nat.blars.org (quaff.nat.blars.org [172.16.2.7])
by renig.nat.blars.org (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-3) with ESMTP id
j848uVMl019471
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT);
Sun, 4 Sep 2005 01:56:31 -0700
Received: from quaff.nat.blars.org (quaff [127.0.0.1])
by quaff.nat.blars.org (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-4) with ESMTP id
j848r0fD018337;
Sun, 4 Sep 2005 01:53:00 -0700
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by quaff.nat.blars.org (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id j848r0SQ018335;
Sun, 4 Sep 2005 01:53:00 -0700
Date: Sun, 4 Sep 2005 01:53:00 -0700
From: Blars Blarson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: raidutils: ftbfs [sparc] 'volatile void exit(int)' conflicts with
/usr/include/stdlib.h
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Reportbug-Version: 3.17
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.10i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Package: raidutils
Version: 0.0.4-6
Severity: serious
Justification: fails to build from source
raidutils failed to build on a sparc buildd, duplicated on my sparc
pbuilder:
if sparc-linux-gnu-g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -I../include -O3 -DMESSAGES
-D_DPT_ACTIVE_ALIGNMENT -Dtrue=1 -Dfalse=0 -DHORIZONTAL -DNEW_RSC_MGR
-DNEW_RSC_HDR -D_DPT_FLASH -g -O2 -MT raidutil-command.o -MD -MP -MF
".deps/raidutil-command.Tpo" -c -o raidutil-command.o `test -f 'command.cpp' ||
echo './'`command.cpp; \
then mv -f ".deps/raidutil-command.Tpo" ".deps/raidutil-command.Po"; else rm -f
".deps/raidutil-command.Tpo"; exit 1; fi
command.cpp:2246: error: declaration of C function 'volatile void exit(int)'
conflicts with
/usr/include/stdlib.h:640: error: previous declaration 'void exit(int)' here
make[3]: *** [raidutil-command.o] Error 1
make[3]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/raidutils-0.0.4/raidutil'
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 326580-close) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Sep 2005 14:50:59 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Sep 04 07:50:59 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EBvlv-0008Jy-00; Sun, 04 Sep 2005 07:47:03 -0700
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Barak A. Pearlmutter)
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#326580: fixed in raidutils 0.0.4-7
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 04 Sep 2005 07:47:03 -0700
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Source: raidutils
Source-Version: 0.0.4-7
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
raidutils, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
raidutils_0.0.4-7.diff.gz
to pool/main/r/raidutils/raidutils_0.0.4-7.diff.gz
raidutils_0.0.4-7.dsc
to pool/main/r/raidutils/raidutils_0.0.4-7.dsc
raidutils_0.0.4-7_i386.deb
to pool/main/r/raidutils/raidutils_0.0.4-7_i386.deb
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Barak A. Pearlmutter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated raidutils package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 4 Sep 2005 15:23:06 +0100
Source: raidutils
Binary: raidutils
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.0.4-7
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Barak A. Pearlmutter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Barak A. Pearlmutter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description:
raidutils - Adaptec I2O hardware RAID management utilities
Closes: 326580
Changes:
raidutils (0.0.4-7) unstable; urgency=low
.
* comment out redundant and potentially incorrect declaration of the
exit() routine (closes: #326580)
Files:
53152a70f7c80721650f40645f6ae981 595 admin optional raidutils_0.0.4-7.dsc
72ae97a4026082d3b73cd7e9770cc3b1 16197 admin optional raidutils_0.0.4-7.diff.gz
568563c59c342cfaf46f9f31092ebdc8 208214 admin optional
raidutils_0.0.4-7_i386.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFDGwSILz4Gnv7CP7IRAlW5AKDipfsXoAYhCPh5MMV1kgpZgtCDmACeOFvE
71gCOxwBcb5PcifrJrHQJYA=
=nuBT
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
