Your message dated Sun, 04 Sep 2005 10:02:08 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#326315: fixed in openwince-jtag 0.5.1-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 2 Sep 2005 20:40:17 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Sep 02 13:40:17 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.17.13] (root)
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
        id 1EBIKd-000646-00; Fri, 02 Sep 2005 13:40:15 -0700
Received: from mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [130.149.17.13])
        by mail.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3p2/8.9.3) with ESMTP id WAA10024
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 2 Sep 2005 22:40:10 +0200 (MEST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
        by mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id E771CFD4A
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri,  2 Sep 2005 22:40:09 +0200 (MEST)
Received: from mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (bueno [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10224) with ESMTP
 id 27519-36 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
 Fri,  2 Sep 2005 22:40:09 +0200 (MEST) 13922
Received: from bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.19.1])
        by mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de (Postfix) with ESMTP
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri,  2 Sep 2005 22:40:09 +0200 (MEST)
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
        by bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.12.10+Sun/8.12.8/Submit) id j82Ke93j003611
        for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 2 Sep 2005 22:40:09 +0200 (MEST)
Date: Fri, 2 Sep 2005 22:40:09 +0200 (MEST)
From: Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: please rebuild with libreadline5-dev as build dependency
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at cs.tu-berlin.de
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: openwince-jtag

The package depends/recommends libreadline4. This version
will be removed from the archive in the near future.
Please change your build dependencies to

     libreadline5-dev | libreadline-dev

Please raise the severity of this bug report to serious,
if the package cannot be built with libreadline5-dev.

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 326315-close) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Sep 2005 17:08:48 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Sep 04 10:08:48 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
        id 1EBxse-0007VP-00; Sun, 04 Sep 2005 10:02:08 -0700
From: Peter De Schrijver (p2) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#326315: fixed in openwince-jtag 0.5.1-5
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 04 Sep 2005 10:02:08 -0700
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Source: openwince-jtag
Source-Version: 0.5.1-5

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
openwince-jtag, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

openwince-jtag_0.5.1-5.diff.gz
  to pool/main/o/openwince-jtag/openwince-jtag_0.5.1-5.diff.gz
openwince-jtag_0.5.1-5.dsc
  to pool/main/o/openwince-jtag/openwince-jtag_0.5.1-5.dsc
openwince-jtag_0.5.1-5_mips.deb
  to pool/main/o/openwince-jtag/openwince-jtag_0.5.1-5_mips.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Peter De Schrijver (p2) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated openwince-jtag 
package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Sun,  4 Sep 2005 19:16:23 +0300
Source: openwince-jtag
Binary: openwince-jtag
Architecture: source mips
Version: 0.5.1-5
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Peter De Schrijver (p2) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Peter De Schrijver (p2) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description: 
 openwince-jtag - allows programming jtag capable devices such as CPUs or FPGAs
Closes: 326315
Changes: 
 openwince-jtag (0.5.1-5) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * rebuild for libreadline5 (Closes: #326315)
Files: 
 c778b9bb75a1c406f6818d5618dca28a 683 embedded optional 
openwince-jtag_0.5.1-5.dsc
 b8400b1785359d9ed547d85947777023 3270 embedded optional 
openwince-jtag_0.5.1-5.diff.gz
 3f00877e2ad45135e67e357eb3af77d7 133548 embedded optional 
openwince-jtag_0.5.1-5_mips.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFDGx8FKLKVw/RurbsRAjY3AJ91XDPZFVU/h6VTOQXKee/1nn+bygCgjqKq
3uOpEsVTpNsrBIHEWJQcVHM=
=jUQz
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to