Your message dated Mon, 05 Sep 2005 11:36:34 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line not a bug in libofx2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 5 Sep 2005 10:35:13 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Sep 05 03:35:13 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from durga.via.ecp.fr [138.195.130.75]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1ECEJl-0007Yv-00; Mon, 05 Sep 2005 03:35:13 -0700
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
by durga.via.ecp.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 636B42139;
Mon, 5 Sep 2005 12:35:10 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from durga.via.ecp.fr ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (durga [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP
id 22189-21; Mon, 5 Sep 2005 12:35:10 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from auguste.simphalempin.com (auguste.via.ecp.fr [138.195.157.220])
by durga.via.ecp.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51D472132;
Mon, 5 Sep 2005 12:35:10 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from remi by auguste.simphalempin.com with local (Exim 3.36 #1
(Debian))
id 1ECEK6-00013o-00; Mon, 05 Sep 2005 12:35:34 +0200
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: =?utf-8?q?R=C3=A9mi_Denis-Courmont?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: liboxf2: Installation fails
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.17
Date: Mon, 05 Sep 2005 12:35:33 +0200
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: =?iso-8859-1?Q?R=C3=A9mi_Denis-Courmont?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at via.ecp.fr
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Package: liboxf2
Version: 1:0.8.0-3
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
There seems to be some conflict between liboxf2 and liboxf1c2 that dpkg
couldn't get correctly :
The following extra packages will be installed:
libofx2
The following NEW packages will be installed:
libofx2
0 upgraded, 1 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
22 not fully installed or removed.
Need to get 0B/571kB of archives.
After unpacking 4133kB of additional disk space will be used.
Do you want to continue [Y/n]?
(Reading database ... 83228 files and directories currently installed.)
Unpacking libofx2 (from .../libofx2_1%3a0.8.0-3_i386.deb) ...
dpkg: error processing
/var/cache/apt/archives/libofx2_1%3a0.8.0-3_i386.deb (--unpack):
trying to overwrite `/usr/lib/libofx.so.2.0.0', which is also in
package libofx1c2
dpkg-deb: subprocess paste killed by signal (Broken pipe)
Errors were encountered while processing:
/var/cache/apt/archives/libofx2_1%3a0.8.0-3_i386.deb
E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)
apt-get is then rendered unusable :-(
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.12.5
Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 326721-done) by bugs.debian.org; 5 Sep 2005 18:36:34 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Sep 05 11:36:34 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from vp085189.reshsg.uci.edu (becket.becket.net) [128.195.85.189]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1ECLpa-0003eC-00; Mon, 05 Sep 2005 11:36:34 -0700
Received: from tb by becket.becket.net with local (Exim 4.52)
id 1ECLpa-0003jW-Ma
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 05 Sep 2005 11:36:34 -0700
From: Thomas Bushnell BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: not a bug in libofx2
X-Reply-Permission: Posted or emailed replies to this message constitute
permission for an emailed response.
X-PGP-Fingerprint: 1F0A1E51 63 28 EB DA E6 44 E5 5E EC F3 04 26 4E BF 1A 92
X-Windows: Dissatisfaction guaranteed.
Date: Mon, 05 Sep 2005 11:36:34 -0700
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
This is not a bug in libofx2; it's a bug in one version of libofx1c2,
which is a package that is no longer built, and the buggy version has
a remove request filed in ftp.debian.org.
The fix is to delete libofx1c2; there should be no packages in
unstable which require it any longer.
Thomas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
