Your message dated Fri, 09 Sep 2005 02:25:11 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Fixed in ara 1.0.10
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Aug 2005 21:45:27 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Aug 28 14:45:27 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from anchor-post-35.mail.demon.net [194.217.242.85] 
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
        id 1E9Uxz-0002Pz-00; Sun, 28 Aug 2005 14:45:27 -0700
Received: from xibalba.demon.co.uk ([80.176.227.229])
        by anchor-post-35.mail.demon.net with esmtp (Exim 4.42)
        id 1E9Ut0-0008gF-HN
        for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 28 Aug 2005 21:40:18 +0000
Date: Sun, 28 Aug 2005 22:46:10 +0100
From: Justin B Rye <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: xara-gtk: do I want this or xara-gtk-byte?
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Reportbug-Version: 3.8
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: xara-gtk
Version: 1.0.9
Severity: wishlist

At present xara-gtk and xara-gtk-byte have precisely identical
package Descriptions, right down to both ending with "This is the
GTK2 GUI version."  I see no recognition of the difference within
the packages, either. 

Presumably there's some technical difference between their build
options; but for someone who isn't an Ocaml programmer it's far from
obvious what the pros and cons of the alternative versions might be.
In an ideal world, that's where the Description would come in.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
Architecture: i386 (i586)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.11.hurakan
Locale: LANG=en_GB, LC_CTYPE=en_GB (charmap=ISO-8859-1)

Versions of packages xara-gtk depends on:
ii  libatk1.0-0                 1.8.0-4      The ATK accessibility toolkit
ii  libc6                       2.3.2.ds1-22 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libglib2.0-0                2.6.4-1      The GLib library of C routines
ii  libgtk2.0-0                 2.6.4-3      The GTK+ graphical user interface 
ii  libpango1.0-0               1.8.1-1      Layout and rendering of internatio

-- no debconf information
-- 
JBR
Ankh kak! (Ancient Egyptian blessing)

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 325469-done) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Sep 2005 00:25:56 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Sep 08 17:25:56 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from sp604002mt.neufgp.fr (sMtp.neuf.fr) [84.96.92.61] 
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
        id 1EDWiK-0004fd-00; Thu, 08 Sep 2005 17:25:56 -0700
Received: from [84.97.235.33] by sp604002mt.gpm.neuf.ld
 (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.03 (built Jun 27 2005))
 with ESMTP id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri,
 09 Sep 2005 02:25:13 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Fri, 09 Sep 2005 02:25:11 +0200
From: Samuel Mimram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Fixed in ara 1.0.10
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
X-Enigmail-Version: 0.89.0.0
X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime
User-Agent: Debian Thunderbird 1.0.6 (X11/20050802)
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 3

Package: ara
Version: 1.0.10

This bug shoud have been closed by the recent upload of ara 1.0.10 (it 
wasn't closed by the changelog because of a typo).


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to