Your message dated Fri, 09 Sep 2005 08:02:05 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#164952: fixed in xprint 1:0.1.0.alpha1-12
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Oct 2002 06:52:15 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Oct 16 01:52:14 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from (strider) [129.94.34.27] (mail)
        by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
        id 181i2Q-00024G-00; Wed, 16 Oct 2002 01:52:14 -0500
Received: from drew by strider with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
        id 181i2G-000686-00; Wed, 16 Oct 2002 16:52:04 +1000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="KOI8-R"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: "Drew Parsons" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Debian Bug Tracking System" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: xprint-xprintorg: binaries should be stripped
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.2
Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2002 16:52:03 +1000
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Drew Parsons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.6 required=5.0
        tests=SPAM_PHRASE_00_01
        version=2.41
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: xprint-xprintorg
Version: unavailable; reported 2002-10-16
Severity: important
Tags: sid

By upstream's request, binaries will not be stripped until further notice.

They should be stripped again in time for the next release (sarge).

Drew


-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux strider 2.4.19 #1 Sun Aug 18 11:36:53 EST 2002 i686
Locale: LANG=ru_RU, LC_CTYPE=ru_RU


---------------------------------------
Received: (at 164952-close) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Sep 2005 15:12:11 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Sep 09 08:12:11 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
        id 1EDkOD-0005Oy-00; Fri, 09 Sep 2005 08:02:05 -0700
From: Drew Parsons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#164952: fixed in xprint 1:0.1.0.alpha1-12
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 09 Sep 2005 08:02:05 -0700
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Source: xprint
Source-Version: 1:0.1.0.alpha1-12

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
xprint, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

xprint-common_0.1.0.alpha1-12_all.deb
  to pool/main/x/xprint/xprint-common_0.1.0.alpha1-12_all.deb
xprint_0.1.0.alpha1-12.diff.gz
  to pool/main/x/xprint/xprint_0.1.0.alpha1-12.diff.gz
xprint_0.1.0.alpha1-12.dsc
  to pool/main/x/xprint/xprint_0.1.0.alpha1-12.dsc
xprint_0.1.0.alpha1-12_i386.deb
  to pool/main/x/xprint/xprint_0.1.0.alpha1-12_i386.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Drew Parsons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated xprint package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 10 Sep 2005 00:38:08 +1000
Source: xprint
Binary: xprint xprint-common
Architecture: source i386 all
Version: 1:0.1.0.alpha1-12
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Drew Parsons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Drew Parsons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description: 
 xprint     - Xprint - the X11 print system (binary)
 xprint-common - Xprint - the X11 print system (configuration files)
Closes: 164952 303123 322078 324267
Changes: 
 xprint (1:0.1.0.alpha1-12) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Patch 93_init_startstopdaemon has the side effect that some log messages
     (errors and warnings) from Xprt are lost, including attempted connections.
     Let me know if you want all such messages back again.
   * Ditch the xprt and xprt-xprintorg dummy packages. Closes: #322078, #303123.
   * Time to start stripping binaries. Closes: #164952.
   * Vietnamese debconf translation. Thanks Clytie Siddall. Closes: #324267.
   * Added xprint-overrides to ignore pesky lintian warnings.
   * Removed 93_check_default_start, since the facility to control rc scripts
     is provided elsewhere (see command update-rc.d, or packages rcconf,
     sysv-rc-conf or file-rc). This means /etc/default/Xprint is no longer
     used. Use the facilities mentioned above if you want Xprint installed
     but not to start up by default.
     However, it is true that the manner in which Debian handles packages is
     only partially implemented. Packages start their daemons using
     invoke-rc.d, whose operations may be controlled by /usr/sbin/policy-rc.d
     it exists. But it does not exist. Therefore upon upgrade (or
     dpkg-reconfigure), the Xprt daemon will be started, even if you have
     correctly set the rc symlinks. You will need to stop it by hand
     "/etc/init.d/xprint stop" (this only applies to upgrades, your rc
     configuration will be honoured at boot).  This is a general Debian
     problem, for having daemons installed but not running. It is *not* an
     Xprint problem.  Sorry.  See Bug#291766 for further discussion.
Files: 
 efe80ce29aebc3849a3b7f1961609ae9 737 x11 optional xprint_0.1.0.alpha1-12.dsc
 07661ca6be06c630843528946111e41d 51227 x11 optional 
xprint_0.1.0.alpha1-12.diff.gz
 2c43eaa17937cf29faa4d990795a2fe9 367384 x11 optional 
xprint-common_0.1.0.alpha1-12_all.deb
 2e2e7c197d946199b960b4a691d10967 1550890 x11 optional 
xprint_0.1.0.alpha1-12_i386.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFDIaEmts5wQWQSTkoRAlbAAJ9APAYfynMjR9I4BZVqHFyWsVzBOACgk0J1
4I3SPgVcBERN3ZO7AAxbcQA=
=j/Xo
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to