Your message dated Fri, 09 Sep 2005 08:02:05 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#322078: fixed in xprint 1:0.1.0.alpha1-12
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Aug 2005 23:12:31 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Aug 08 16:12:31 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from 148.red-213-96-98.pooles.rima-tde.net (silicio) [213.96.98.148]
(Debian-exim)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1E2GnH-0002tL-00; Mon, 08 Aug 2005 16:12:31 -0700
Received: from jfs by silicio with local (Exim 4.52)
id 1E2GnF-0004U1-MJ
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 09 Aug 2005 01:12:29 +0200
Date: Tue, 9 Aug 2005 01:12:29 +0200
From: Javier =?iso-8859-1?Q?Fern=E1ndez-Sanguino_Pe=F1a?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: xprint: Dummy packages (2) generated from source package still needed?
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ni93GHxFvA+th69W"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
--ni93GHxFvA+th69W
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Package: xprint
Version: 1:0.1.0.alpha1-11
Priority: wishlist
This source package provides several dummy packages which are present in=20
sarge, etch and sid: xprt and xprt-xprintorg
As these are dummy transition-only package (for woody), is there
any reason why these should still exist in the distribution?=20
Notice that we currently only support upgrade paths from stable=20
(currently sarge) to "new stable" (currently etch) and in both=20
these distributions these packages are dummy package. For more=20
information read the Release Notes [1].
If they are no longer required, please ask for their removal by
reassigning this bug to ftp.debian.org or remove them from
your control file in your next upload.=20
Regards
Javier
[1]
http://www.nl.debian.org/releases/stable/i386/release-notes/ch-upgrading#s-=
system-status
--ni93GHxFvA+th69W
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFC9+bdsandgtyBSwkRAkkJAJ4wn0dbIJDlagN1SGYmgh2b9mTp0wCfS+yZ
rnd19PtpDJare0dl+o1V08M=
=kne4
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--ni93GHxFvA+th69W--
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 322078-close) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Sep 2005 15:11:10 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Sep 09 08:11:10 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EDkOD-0005P2-00; Fri, 09 Sep 2005 08:02:05 -0700
From: Drew Parsons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#322078: fixed in xprint 1:0.1.0.alpha1-12
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 09 Sep 2005 08:02:05 -0700
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 3
Source: xprint
Source-Version: 1:0.1.0.alpha1-12
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
xprint, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
xprint-common_0.1.0.alpha1-12_all.deb
to pool/main/x/xprint/xprint-common_0.1.0.alpha1-12_all.deb
xprint_0.1.0.alpha1-12.diff.gz
to pool/main/x/xprint/xprint_0.1.0.alpha1-12.diff.gz
xprint_0.1.0.alpha1-12.dsc
to pool/main/x/xprint/xprint_0.1.0.alpha1-12.dsc
xprint_0.1.0.alpha1-12_i386.deb
to pool/main/x/xprint/xprint_0.1.0.alpha1-12_i386.deb
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Drew Parsons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated xprint package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 10 Sep 2005 00:38:08 +1000
Source: xprint
Binary: xprint xprint-common
Architecture: source i386 all
Version: 1:0.1.0.alpha1-12
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Drew Parsons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Drew Parsons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description:
xprint - Xprint - the X11 print system (binary)
xprint-common - Xprint - the X11 print system (configuration files)
Closes: 164952 303123 322078 324267
Changes:
xprint (1:0.1.0.alpha1-12) unstable; urgency=low
.
* Patch 93_init_startstopdaemon has the side effect that some log messages
(errors and warnings) from Xprt are lost, including attempted connections.
Let me know if you want all such messages back again.
* Ditch the xprt and xprt-xprintorg dummy packages. Closes: #322078, #303123.
* Time to start stripping binaries. Closes: #164952.
* Vietnamese debconf translation. Thanks Clytie Siddall. Closes: #324267.
* Added xprint-overrides to ignore pesky lintian warnings.
* Removed 93_check_default_start, since the facility to control rc scripts
is provided elsewhere (see command update-rc.d, or packages rcconf,
sysv-rc-conf or file-rc). This means /etc/default/Xprint is no longer
used. Use the facilities mentioned above if you want Xprint installed
but not to start up by default.
However, it is true that the manner in which Debian handles packages is
only partially implemented. Packages start their daemons using
invoke-rc.d, whose operations may be controlled by /usr/sbin/policy-rc.d
it exists. But it does not exist. Therefore upon upgrade (or
dpkg-reconfigure), the Xprt daemon will be started, even if you have
correctly set the rc symlinks. You will need to stop it by hand
"/etc/init.d/xprint stop" (this only applies to upgrades, your rc
configuration will be honoured at boot). This is a general Debian
problem, for having daemons installed but not running. It is *not* an
Xprint problem. Sorry. See Bug#291766 for further discussion.
Files:
efe80ce29aebc3849a3b7f1961609ae9 737 x11 optional xprint_0.1.0.alpha1-12.dsc
07661ca6be06c630843528946111e41d 51227 x11 optional
xprint_0.1.0.alpha1-12.diff.gz
2c43eaa17937cf29faa4d990795a2fe9 367384 x11 optional
xprint-common_0.1.0.alpha1-12_all.deb
2e2e7c197d946199b960b4a691d10967 1550890 x11 optional
xprint_0.1.0.alpha1-12_i386.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFDIaEmts5wQWQSTkoRAlbAAJ9APAYfynMjR9I4BZVqHFyWsVzBOACgk0J1
4I3SPgVcBERN3ZO7AAxbcQA=
=j/Xo
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
