Your message dated Sat, 10 Sep 2005 16:18:08 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#225004: tetex-extra: Type1 fonts should be in a separate
package
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at maintonly) by bugs.debian.org; 11 May 2002 04:45:05 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri May 10 23:45:05 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from cs6625132-47.austin.rr.com (dragon.taral.net) [66.25.132.47]
(postfix)
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 176Okj-0001ck-00; Fri, 10 May 2002 23:45:05 -0500
Received: from localhost (hatchling.taral.net [192.168.7.2])
by dragon.taral.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id F002113E3F
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 10 May 2002 23:45:00 -0500 (CDT)
Received: by localhost (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 81F2A30029; Fri, 10 May 2002 23:44:59 -0500 (CDT)
Date: Fri, 10 May 2002 23:44:59 -0500
From: Taral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: mozilla-browser: Need package to install MathML fonts
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
X-Reportbug-Version: 1.50
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: mozilla-browser
Version: 2:1+rc1-3
Severity: minor
A package should be created that installs the necessary fonts to render
MathML, as per this page:
http://www.mozilla.org/projects/mathml/fonts/
--
Taral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
This message is digitally signed. Please PGP encrypt mail to me.
"Pretty please with dollars on top?" -- Me
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 225004-done) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Sep 2005 14:18:42 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Sep 10 07:18:42 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from smtp07.web.de [217.72.192.225]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EE6Bm-0007dI-00; Sat, 10 Sep 2005 07:18:42 -0700
Received: from [213.6.172.177] (helo=preusse.amasol.de)
by smtp07.web.de with asmtp (WEB.DE 4.105 #314)
id 1EE6BG-0007be-00
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 10 Sep 2005 16:18:11 +0200
Received: by preusse.amasol.de (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Sat, 10 Sep 2005
16:18:08 +0200
Date: Sat, 10 Sep 2005 16:18:08 +0200
From: Hilmar Preusse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#225004: tetex-extra: Type1 fonts should be in a separate
package
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i
X-Operating-System: CYGWIN_NT-5.0 1.5.18(0.132/4/2) i686
X-Face: .n=jHnz:2pu0c0)ef]4O#1FE{Vak?h89!g7_#2+PzSRoIU[pJFNnz>gLhn}UMwv}4/j{X..
2E+>U>P!`PYk
X-Confirmation-Request: yes
X-Confirm-Reading-To: "Hilmar Preusse" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.8 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS,
HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
On 24.12.03 Victor Porton ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Hi,
> Type1 fonts (together with corresponding .afm files) contained in
> this package (such as "eufm" font) should be in a separate package
> (tetex-extra-fonts?).
>
> They are needed independingly of TeX (e.g. for math on the Web in
> MathML format).
>
This bug (and his brothers) mainly spoke about making the CM fonts
(.pfb and .afm files) of tetex-extra available to XFree and split
them off into a separate package. The reasons are described above.
Meanwhile there exist latex-xft-fonts, which should do the job
independent of teTeX and both browsers suggest the fonts. Therefore I
close the bug.
However me and other people from d-t-maint (thanks to Florent, Frank
and Atsuhito) put some work into #225004 I don't want to throw away.
Hence I posted the latest patch for it into #327480 together with a
TODO list.
I promise I don't have the time to work on this, so don't expect any
further action. Sorry!
Regards,
Hilmar
--
sigmentation fault
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
