Your message dated Thu, 3 Feb 2011 15:01:46 +0100
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#611899: thank you jakub - bug fixed
has caused the Debian Bug report #611899,
regarding python2.5 + openssl + xen-utils + squeeze = No module named _md5
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
611899: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=611899
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: python2.5
Version: 2.5.5-11
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks the whole system
Have just started upgrading this xen server (dom0) from Lenny to Squeeze.
=> xm has broken - no domU can be brought up from the command line
The problem appears to be that xen-utils depends on python2.5, but python2.5 no
longer
provides the md5 module. Google suggests that this is due to changes in
openssl, but
I am unable to confirm that.
The error message from any invocation of xm is:
No module named _md5
The error can also be reproduced directly in the python2.5 interpreter.
It does not exist in the python2.6 interpreter.
The error can also be reproduced directly in the python2.5 interpreter.
It does not exist in the python2.6 interpreter.
john@mis79:/usr/lib/python2.5$ python2.5
Python 2.5.5 (r255:77872, Nov 28 2010, 16:43:48)
[GCC 4.4.5] on linux2
Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information.
>>> import md5
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module>
File "/usr/lib/python2.5/md5.py", line 6, in <module>
from hashlib import md5
File "/usr/lib/python2.5/hashlib.py", line 133, in <module>
md5 = __get_builtin_constructor('md5')
File "/usr/lib/python2.5/hashlib.py", line 60, in __get_builtin_constructor
import _md5
ImportError: No module named _md5
>>> quit()
john@mis79:/usr/lib/python2.5$ ls -la md5* hashlib*
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 4905 2010-11-29 05:22 hashlib.py
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 4179 2011-02-03 19:24 hashlib.pyc
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 282 2010-11-29 05:22 md5.py
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 235 2011-02-03 19:24 md5.pyc
john@mis79:/usr/lib/python2.5$ python2.6
Python 2.6.6 (r266:84292, Dec 26 2010, 22:31:48)
[GCC 4.4.5] on linux2
Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information.
>>> import md5
>>> quit()
I can try to do further testing, but my email client is currently locked inside
an
unaccessible domU :-( I will watch the bug tracker.
bfn,
John
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 5.0.4
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-xen-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_AU.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_AU.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Versions of packages python2.5 depends on:
ii libbz2-1.0 1.0.5-6 high-quality block-sorting file co
ii libc6 2.11.2-10 Embedded GNU C Library: Shared lib
ii libdb4.8 4.8.30-2 Berkeley v4.8 Database Libraries [
ii libncursesw5 5.7+20100313-5 shared libraries for terminal hand
ii libreadline6 6.1-3 GNU readline and history libraries
ii libsqlite3-0 3.7.3-1 SQLite 3 shared library
ii libssl0.9.8 0.9.8o-4 SSL shared libraries
ii mime-support 3.44-1 MIME files 'mime.types' & 'mailcap
ii python2.5-minimal 2.5.5-11 A minimal subset of the Python lan
python2.5 recommends no packages.
Versions of packages python2.5 suggests:
pn python-profiler <none> (no description available)
pn python2.5-doc <none> (no description available)
-- no debconf information
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 00:54:05 +1100, System Administrator wrote:
>
> Following on from your suggestions, I went looking for any out of date
> libraries.
> Turns out that there was a libcrypto.so.0.9.8 which was being found, and which
> was not updated by aptitude.
>
> Moved it to another directory where it would not be found, the problem went
> away.
> So this bug can be closed - which is excellent, particularly so close to the
> proposed release!
>
> Thank you very much for your prompt response, Jakub.
>
Thanks, closing.
Cheers,
Julien
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--- End Message ---
