Your message dated Fri, 11 Feb 2011 08:32:11 +0000
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Bug#612813: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #612813,
regarding RM: openoffice.org [alpha amd64 armel i386 ia64 kfreebsd-amd64
kfreebsd-i386 mips mipsel powerpc s390 sparc] -- ANAIS; obsoleted by _all
transitional packages
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
612813: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=612813
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
Hi,
as discussed (log for reference) please remove all arch-dep remains
of the openoffice.org source package (and openoffice.org in 3.2.1-11+squeeze1).
They got replaced by completely by _all files and dak holds it back.
21:43 < _rene_> can some ftp-person shed some light on why, though
openoffice.org-* 3.3.0-3 is in the archive, it doesn't appear in Packages file
(clean sid
chroot doesn't see it?)
21:44 < _rene_> maybe because there's the old ones taking precedence?
21:44 < _rene_> (they are arch-dep, while the new ones are all arch-indep ->
transitional packages)
21:45 < _rene_> which then results in e.g. #612807
21:47 < Ganneff> could it be that you converted it all to arch:all?
21:49 < _rene_> yep
21:49 < _rene_> all packages
21:49 < _rene_> (and I dropped some which don't need transitional packages)
21:52 < Ganneff> twerner: is that a case touched by the changes from last
essen, where newer arch all will be hold back due to "missing" arch any? ie
need to
remove older arch any here
21:53 < _rene_> ah, that would make sense, yes.
21:53 < _rene_> like when you upload package X which has _all packages and X
isn't yet built.
21:54 < _rene_> that would also explain the britney symptoms...
21:59 < _rene_> should I file a RM or will you do it?
21:59 < Ganneff> you could file one
Grüße/Regards,
Rene
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following
package(s) have been removed from unstable:
mozilla-openoffice.org | 1:3.2.1-11+squeeze2 | alpha, amd64, armel, i386, ia64,
kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc
openoffice.org | 1:3.2.1-11+squeeze2 | alpha, amd64, armel, i386, ia64,
kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc
openoffice.org-base-core | 1:3.2.1-11+squeeze2 | alpha, amd64, i386, ia64,
kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc
openoffice.org-core | 1:3.2.1-11+squeeze2 | alpha, amd64, armel, i386, ia64,
kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc
openoffice.org-dbg | 1:3.2.1-11+squeeze2 | alpha, amd64, armel, i386, ia64,
kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc
openoffice.org-dev | 1:3.2.1-11+squeeze2 | alpha, amd64, armel, i386, ia64,
kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc
openoffice.org-report-builder-bin | 1:3.2.1-11+squeeze2 | alpha, amd64, i386,
ia64, kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc
------------------- Reason -------------------
ANAIS; obsoleted by _all transitional packages
----------------------------------------------
Note that the package(s) have simply been removed from the tag
database and may (or may not) still be in the pool; this is not a bug.
The package(s) will be physically removed automatically when no suite
references them (and in the case of source, when no binary references
it). Please also remember that the changes have been done on the
master archive (ftp-master.debian.org) and will not propagate to any
mirrors (ftp.debian.org included) until the next cron.daily run at the
earliest.
Packages are usually not removed from testing by hand. Testing tracks
unstable and will automatically remove packages which were removed
from unstable when removing them from testing causes no dependency
problems. The release team can force a removal from testing if it is
really needed, please contact them if this should be the case.
Bugs which have been reported against this package are not automatically
removed from the Bug Tracking System. Please check all open bugs and
close them or re-assign them to another package if the removed package
was superseded by another one.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to [email protected].
The full log for this bug can be viewed at http://bugs.debian.org/612813
This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
[email protected].
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Torsten Werner (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)
--- End Message ---
