Your message dated Sun, 11 Sep 2005 20:58:09 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Please remove ecasound2.2 obsolete dummy package
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Aug 2005 15:03:19 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Aug 08 08:03:19 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from 148.red-213-96-98.pooles.rima-tde.net (silicio) [213.96.98.148]
(Debian-exim)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1E299r-0006Dv-00; Mon, 08 Aug 2005 08:03:19 -0700
Received: from jfs by silicio with local (Exim 4.52)
id 1E299p-0005ss-5q
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 08 Aug 2005 17:03:17 +0200
Date: Mon, 8 Aug 2005 17:03:17 +0200
From: Javier =?iso-8859-1?Q?Fern=E1ndez-Sanguino_Pe=F1a?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: ecasound2.2: Dummy package still needed?
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="4vpci17Ql0Nrbul2"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
--4vpci17Ql0Nrbul2
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Package: ecasound2.2
Priority: wishlist
Version: 2.4.1-1
This dummy package is present in sarge, etch and sid. As this is a dummy
transition-only package (for which release?), is there any reason this
package should still exist in the distribution? Notice that we currently
only support upgrade paths from stable (currently sarge) to
"new stable" (currently etch) and in both these distributions
this package is a dummy package. For more information read the
Release Notes [1].
If this package is no longer required, please ask for its removal by
reassigning this bug to ftp.debian.org. If you want to provide
upgrade paths for woody for the time being please don't forget to
remove this package before etch is frozen.
Also please reassign the pending bugs on this package (3 at the moment)
to the package that replaces it.
Regards
Javier
[1]
http://www.nl.debian.org/releases/stable/i386/release-notes/ch-upgrading#s-system-status
--4vpci17Ql0Nrbul2
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFC93Q1sandgtyBSwkRAgvNAJ0aI76NuOTpEN3ADqrqhRnzqmpOCQCaA1m/
D9CuHkDwqXI8S4iJwXbfriY=
=bs9I
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--4vpci17Ql0Nrbul2--
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 321981-done) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Sep 2005 18:58:29 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Sep 11 11:58:29 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from a-eskwadraat.nl [131.211.39.72]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EEX1n-0007Uw-00; Sun, 11 Sep 2005 11:58:11 -0700
Received: from 220pc220.sshunet.nl
([145.97.220.220] helo=mordor.wolffelaar.nl ident=Debian-exim)
by a-eskwadraat.nl with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32)
(Exim 4.50)
id 1EEX1l-0002z0-Sd; Sun, 11 Sep 2005 20:58:09 +0200
Received: from jeroen by mordor.wolffelaar.nl with local (Exim 4.50)
id 1EEX1l-0006GZ-AD; Sun, 11 Sep 2005 20:58:09 +0200
Date: Sun, 11 Sep 2005 20:58:09 +0200
To: Mohammed =?iso-8859-1?Q?Adn=E8ne?= Trojette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Debian Bugs Control Bot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Please remove ecasound2.2 obsolete dummy package
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
From: Jeroen van Wolffelaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,VALID_BTS_CONTROL
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2
reassign 321981 ecasound2.2
thanks
On Sat, Sep 10, 2005 at 12:35:18AM +0200, Mohammed Adnène Trojette wrote:
> reopen 321981
> reassign 321981 ftp.debian.org
> retitle RM: ecasound2.2 -- RoQA; obsolete dummy package
> thanks
>
> Binary already removed from debian/control. I think it should be
> removed.
This happens semi-automagically when you stop building packages, no need
to reopen a bug and then reassign it.
--Jeroen
--
Jeroen van Wolffelaar
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://jeroen.A-Eskwadraat.nl
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
