Your message dated Wed, 14 Sep 2005 13:02:21 -0500 (CDT)
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line WNPP bug closed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 6 Jul 2004 22:04:48 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jul 06 15:04:48 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from kerouac.projectcolo.org.uk [80.71.3.114]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Bhy3U-0002A1-00; Tue, 06 Jul 2004 15:04:48 -0700
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by kerouac.projectcolo.org.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA3B17A003;
Tue, 6 Jul 2004 23:04:46 +0100 (BST)
Received: from kerouac.projectcolo.org.uk ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (kerouac [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id 05427-04; Tue, 6 Jul 2004 23:04:46 +0100 (BST)
Received: from shenandoah.sirena.org.uk
(82-41-27-125.cable.ubr04.edin.blueyonder.co.uk [82.41.27.125])
(using TLSv1 with cipher EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA (168/168 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by kerouac.projectcolo.org.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F58879FE1;
Tue, 6 Jul 2004 23:04:46 +0100 (BST)
Received: from raphaela (raphaela.sirena.org.uk [192.168.56.10])
by shenandoah.sirena.org.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id E806C3AF4A;
Tue, 6 Jul 2004 23:04:45 +0100 (BST)
Received: by raphaela (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id EFEBEC6DA5; Tue, 6 Jul 2004 23:04:44 +0100 (BST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Mark Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Please provide fsck.hfsplus
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.63
Date: Tue, 06 Jul 2004 23:04:44 +0100
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p9 (Debian) at projectcolo.org.uk
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
Package: hfsplus
Version: 1.0.4-5
Severity: wishlist
Since 2.6 kernels now support HFS+ it would be nice if a fsck
implementation with the standard interface was provided.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: powerpc (ppc)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.7-powerpc
Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8
Versions of packages hfsplus depends on:
ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-13 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii libhfsp0 1.0.4-5 shared library to access HFS+ form
-- no debconf information
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 229769-done) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Sep 2005 18:02:29 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Sep 14 11:02:28 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from dsl-201-129-37-187.prod-infinitum.com.mx (cerdita.damog.net)
[201.129.37.187]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EFbaW-00010Q-00; Wed, 14 Sep 2005 11:02:28 -0700
Received: by cerdita.damog.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id E63B210786C; Wed, 14 Sep 2005 13:02:21 -0500 (CDT)
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: WNPP bug closed
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2005 13:02:21 -0500 (CDT)
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (David Moreno Garza)
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,VALID_BTS_CONTROL
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 310
Hello,
This an automatic message sent to owners of inactive ITPs on the Debian
Bug Tracking System.
I'm closing your bug because of the following reasons:
- It is older than 600 days old.
- It haven't had any activity recently.
- The amount of ITPs on the Debian BTS is huge and we need to
clean up a bit the place.
If your bug shouldn't be closed, you are more than free to re-open it,
for example, if you still have intentions to package the software in
question or the like. To re-open it, you simply have to mail
[EMAIL PROTECTED] with a body text like this:
reopen 123456
thanks bts
Replacing '123456' for the number of your ITP bug. The subject of the
mail is ignored. Or if you have any kind of problems when dealing with
the BTS, feel free to contact me and I'd be more than happy to help
you on this: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
This is the first mass wnpp closing that will be done. The next close
will be done on inactive ITPs older than 450 days and finally, the
ones older than 365 days (an automatic script will close *inactive*
ITPs when they reach one year old).
A similar process will be applied to the RFP wnpp bugs in the next
days.
Thanks for your cooperation,
David Moreno Garza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
