Your message dated Sat, 30 Apr 2011 12:16:20 +0000
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Bug#624104: fixed
has caused the Debian Bug report #624104,
regarding override: python-pybabel:oldlibs/extra
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)


-- 
624104: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=624104
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal

python-pybabel_0.9.6-1_all.deb: package says section is oldlibs, override says
python.
python-pybabel_0.9.6-1_all.deb: package says priority is optional, override
says extra.

The package was renamed from python-pybabel to python-babel and python-pybabel
package is now empty transitional one so it should go to oldlibs. New
'optional' priority looks like an error to me, so it should stay 'extra', this
will be fixed in the next upload.



(Describe here the reason for this change)



--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following
changes were made to the overrides...

Concerning package python-pybabel...
Operating on the unstable suite
Changed section from python to oldlibs


Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [email protected].

This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
[email protected].

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Luca Falavigna (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)


--- End Message ---

Reply via email to