Your message dated Thu, 15 Sep 2005 11:43:18 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#247703: libssl-dev: libssl does not link with gcc 3.3 with
any object on SPARC64
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 6 May 2004 14:31:17 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu May 06 07:31:17 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from www.tschaeche.com (ns.tschaeche.com) [213.133.112.43]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BLju8-0006K3-00; Thu, 06 May 2004 07:31:17 -0700
Received: from ns.tschaeche.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
by ns.tschaeche.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i46E5Csa002945
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 6 May 2004 16:05:12 +0200
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by ns.tschaeche.com (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id i46E561U002944
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 6 May 2004 16:05:06 +0200
Date: Thu, 6 May 2004 16:05:06 +0200
From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Olli_Tsch=E4che?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: libssl-dev: libssl does not link with gcc 3.3 with any object on
SPARC64
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i
X-Virus-Scanned: clamd / ClamAV version 0.67, clamav-milter version 0.66n
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 1
Package: libssl-dev
Version: 0.9.7d-1
Severity: normal
*** Please type your report below this line ***
Compiling OpenVPN-1.6rc4 (and other sources) does not link
against libcrypto, liblzo. Maybe linker bug?!
Output of configure:
configure:8202: result: yes
configure:8232: checking for openssl/evp.h
configure:8239: result: yes
configure:8244: checking for EVP_CIPHER_CTX_init in -lcrypto
configure:8275: gcc -o conftest -g -O2 -I. conftest.c -lcrypto >&5
/usr/bin/ld: skipping incompatible
/usr/lib/gcc-lib/sparc-linux/3.3.3/../../../libcrypto.so when searching for
-lcrypto
/usr/bin/ld: skipping incompatible
/usr/lib/gcc-lib/sparc-linux/3.3.3/../../../libcrypto.a when searching for
-lcrypto
/usr/bin/ld: skipping incompatible /usr/bin/../lib/libcrypto.so when searching
for -lcrypto
/usr/bin/ld: skipping incompatible /usr/bin/../lib/libcrypto.a when searching
for -lcrypto
/usr/bin/ld: skipping incompatible /usr/lib/libcrypto.so when searching for
-lcrypto
/usr/bin/ld: skipping incompatible /usr/lib/libcrypto.a when searching for
-lcrypto
/usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lcrypto
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: sparc (sparc64)
Kernel: Linux 2.4.26-sparc64-smp
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.ISO-8859-1
Versions of packages libssl-dev depends on:
ii libssl0.9.7 0.9.7d-1 SSL shared libraries
-- no debconf information
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 247703-done) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Sep 2005 09:44:14 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Sep 15 02:44:14 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mailgate1.verwaltung.uni-mainz.de
(patty.verwaltung.uni-mainz.de) [134.93.144.165]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EFqHu-0007tM-00; Thu, 15 Sep 2005 02:44:14 -0700
Received: from charlie.verwaltung.uni-mainz.de ([EMAIL PROTECTED]
[134.93.226.11])
by patty.verwaltung.uni-mainz.de (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-3) with ESMTP id
j8F9hNc4002246
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT);
Thu, 15 Sep 2005 11:43:23 +0200
Received: from [134.93.226.8] (woodstock.verwaltung.uni-mainz.de [134.93.226.8])
(authenticated bits=0)
by charlie.verwaltung.uni-mainz.de (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-3) with ESMTP
id j8F9hM8B028031
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT);
Thu, 15 Sep 2005 11:43:23 +0200
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2005 11:43:18 +0200
From: Christoph Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; de-DE; rv:1.7.6) Gecko/20050817
Thunderbird/1.0.2 Mnenhy/0.7.2.0
X-Accept-Language: de-DE, de, en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Oliver Tschaeche <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#247703: libssl-dev: libssl does not link with gcc 3.3 with
any object on SPARC64
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Enigmail-Version: 0.91.0.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature";
boundary="------------enig29D108FE77C13F4B17811C9E"
X-Virus-Scanned-From: mailgate1.verwaltung.uni-mainz.de
X-Spam-Scanned-From: mailgate1.verwaltung.uni-mainz.de
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.51 on 134.93.226.4
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156)
--------------enig29D108FE77C13F4B17811C9E
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Oliver Tschaeche schrieb:
> On Tue, Sep 06, 2005 at 05:40:16PM +0200, Christoph Martin wrote:
>
>>I don't understand this.
>>
>>The library was build with standard options for sparc. There is no
>>special optimization or assembercode involved. I don't know a lot about
>>SPARC64. Is it really compatible with normal sparc architecture?
>
>
> Sorry, can't verify that anymore. I replaced the SPARC by an Intel
> system.
Thanks for the mail.
Closing the bug then.
--
============================================================================
Christoph Martin, Leiter der EDV der Verwaltung, Uni-Mainz, Germany
Internet-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Telefon: +49-6131-3926337
Fax: +49-6131-3922856
--------------enig29D108FE77C13F4B17811C9E
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFDKUI6geVih7XOVJcRApgBAKCVqhbFVYShNejPF2b017MFCrqzmgCeP1Fw
EeK47O6/yCczY0aH7YeDfOg=
=vRAr
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--------------enig29D108FE77C13F4B17811C9E--
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
