Your message dated Mon, 16 May 2011 20:16:04 +0200
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: mount -t ntfs-3g but mount reports "fuseblk"
has caused the Debian Bug report #586173,
regarding mount -t ntfs-3g but mount reports "fuseblk"
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
586173: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=586173
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: ntfs-3g
Version: 1:2010.3.6-1
Severity: wishlist
File: /usr/share/man/man8/ntfs-3g.8.gz
The man page says
mount -t ntfs-3g volume mount_point [-o option[,...]]
but the type then reported by mount(8) is different,
/dev/sda1 on /mnt/extra type fuseblk (rw,allow_other,blksize=4096)
and the man page doesn't mention anything about "fuseblk",
so the user thinks it is an error. So do mention something somewhere...
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
i don't see a bug here; first, the manpage is correct, i don't see
anything wrong with the 'mount -t ntfs-3g [...]' statement. second, that
the fuse type is reported of course correct, the kernel doesn't know
about the fuse filesystems in userspace. third, 'fuseblk' needs to be
documented in fuse, not (all) the packages that make use of fuse.
therefore, closing this bug.
--
Address: Daniel Baumann, Donnerbuehlweg 3, CH-3012 Bern
Email: [email protected]
Internet: http://people.progress-technologies.net/~daniel.baumann/
--- End Message ---
