Your message dated Sat, 28 May 2011 13:17:12 +0000
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Bug#622409: fixed in acl 2.2.49-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #622409,
regarding acl: Getting rid of unneeded *.la / emptying dependency_libs
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
622409: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=622409
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: acl
Version: 2.2.49-4
Severity: normal
User: [email protected]
Usertags: la-file-removal
To finish an old release goal from Squeeze, to comply with Policy
10.2 and to ease the introduction of MultiArch, I'm filing bugs
against packages which contain .la files which can be either removed
or stripped of the dependency_libs variable.
http://wiki.debian.org/ReleaseGoals/LAFileRemoval
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2011/04/msg00055.html
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2011/04/msg00199.html
Data has been obtained from the output of an automated script:
http://release.debian.org/~aba/la/current.txt
The output is best read in conjunction with the criteria from this
post to debian-devel:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2009/08/msg00808.html
To generate the list of packages, I've used:
grep -v depended-on current.txt |cut -d: -f1
The data is regularly updated but please accept my apologies if you
have made an upload which changes the situation since the data was
parsed.
acl appears in this list as a source package because one or more of
the binary packages (usually -dev packages) contain .la files.
In most cases, the .la file(s) can simply be removed as the process
behind this MBF has already identified that there are no further
dependencies using the .la file. In the unusual case that your
package uses libltdl directly, it is still necessary to empty the
dependency_libs part of all .la files remaining in the package. Once
acl is fixed, the process will repeat and other packages which you
maintain may need to be fixed in turn. It is important that packages
are fixed in sequence to avoid FTBFS bugs.
If you believe that your package needs both the .la file and the
dependency_libs settings, please raise this on debian-devel for
clarification.
--
Neil Williams
=============
[email protected]
http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: acl
Source-Version: 2.2.49-5
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
acl, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
acl_2.2.49-5.debian.tar.bz2
to main/a/acl/acl_2.2.49-5.debian.tar.bz2
acl_2.2.49-5.dsc
to main/a/acl/acl_2.2.49-5.dsc
acl_2.2.49-5_i386.deb
to main/a/acl/acl_2.2.49-5_i386.deb
libacl1-dev_2.2.49-5_i386.deb
to main/a/acl/libacl1-dev_2.2.49-5_i386.deb
libacl1_2.2.49-5_i386.deb
to main/a/acl/libacl1_2.2.49-5_i386.deb
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to [email protected],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Luk Claes <[email protected]> (supplier of updated acl package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [email protected])
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 28 May 2011 09:10:42 +0200
Source: acl
Binary: acl libacl1-dev libacl1
Architecture: source i386
Version: 2.2.49-5
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Nathan Scott <[email protected]>
Changed-By: Luk Claes <[email protected]>
Description:
acl - Access control list utilities
libacl1 - Access control list shared library
libacl1-dev - Access control list static libraries and headers
Closes: 284167 621929 622409
Changes:
acl (2.2.49-5) unstable; urgency=medium
.
* Add myself as comaintainer
* Use bash in build process (Closes: #621929)
* Pass host & build to allow cross builds to succeed (Closes: #284167)
* Remove references to other libraries from dependency_libs field
(Closes: #622409)
Checksums-Sha1:
52324389800cf13b7b765d807a30ee6fbe3eea95 1269 acl_2.2.49-5.dsc
f1746bea9fb96448a3995d3618f7c0f56896e9fc 11169 acl_2.2.49-5.debian.tar.bz2
7c24d62b7bba93b6c7f24ef6c4d6119e643305eb 64510 acl_2.2.49-5_i386.deb
75858d5c8fb06bf9b295236026cf5edad76cf086 89998 libacl1-dev_2.2.49-5_i386.deb
a40866d0ec44449bec004db96035b83639adc220 29002 libacl1_2.2.49-5_i386.deb
Checksums-Sha256:
62ca43ef32eb85ae11225f23822c73802414a30a73c691c9001c9ef6285ff824 1269
acl_2.2.49-5.dsc
eef316ac459c3cacd086910903d52393f369d7fa32e7ea048867b44e120242b1 11169
acl_2.2.49-5.debian.tar.bz2
2f5ff674712ced337a9797fcdc2f4a08d1c9ccac6fcb04f166c6605d53df14d2 64510
acl_2.2.49-5_i386.deb
5a53a18413dbcf92ad79d53458eeee6d46578061bf4017c5c26e0e3ad4c7ed8e 89998
libacl1-dev_2.2.49-5_i386.deb
8cb6ae4ab5270ef85d322af391b0d286d24d7fcb91c57471497b0bef9b95b161 29002
libacl1_2.2.49-5_i386.deb
Files:
a216210ac9cd9ffd6da9f211d544efa6 1269 utils optional acl_2.2.49-5.dsc
7609408a05e34a198264a03c2eb1a153 11169 utils optional
acl_2.2.49-5.debian.tar.bz2
e71d291976e69d699f87fee286351a4c 64510 utils optional acl_2.2.49-5_i386.deb
7b4b70e3e9ef5c82d027f44da12df9df 89998 libdevel extra
libacl1-dev_2.2.49-5_i386.deb
2e97d79eb0da1d9e22055ba43610e76f 29002 libs required libacl1_2.2.49-5_i386.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEARECAAYFAk3g9L8ACgkQ5UTeB5t8Mo3jMwCginyON63F6iZOwKEpkxc7KR6W
/FwAni9/AS6n6dluE6YB7yfipJKjtJbZ
=eK7w
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--- End Message ---
