Your message dated Thu, 15 Sep 2005 17:20:34 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#328144: fixed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Sep 2005 21:04:24 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Sep 13 14:04:24 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from 84-120-66-144.onocable.ono.com (chistera.yi.org) [84.120.66.144]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EFHx1-00049E-00; Tue, 13 Sep 2005 14:04:24 -0700
Received: from userid 1000 by chistera.yi.org with local (Exim 4.52)
id 1EFHx0-0005As-Nq
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 13 Sep 2005 23:04:22 +0200
Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2005 23:04:22 +0200
From: Adeodato =?utf-8?B?U2ltw7M=?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RM: kcdlabel -- RoM; dead upstream, superseded
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-No-CC: Please respect my Mail-Followup-To header
X-Debbugs-CC: Stephen Gran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.10i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-9.8 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS,
HAS_PACKAGE,X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=ham
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Package: ftp.debian.org
----- Forwarded message from Stephen Gran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -----
=46rom: Stephen Gran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Adeodato Sim=C3=B3 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2005 08:53:59 +0100
Subject: Re: Bug#327947: kcdlabel: uninstallable; needs rebuild for the Qt/=
KDE transition
This one time, at band camp, Adeodato Sim=C3=B3 said:
> Hello,
> This is a grave bug filed against your package because it depends on
> libqt3c102-mt, which no longer exists, thus rendering yor package
> uninstallable in unstable. As part of the C++ ABI transition, this
> library has moved to the libqt3-mt package.
> Simply recompiling and uploading your package should be enough to fix
> this; as per this mail [1], you need not bump your Qt, kdelibs or aRts
> build-dependencies. Beware, though, that that may not be the case for
> all the involved librares. Also, make sure that you build the package
> in an up to date and clean sid environment, so that final dependencies
> are correct. Please do this as soon as possible in order to accelerate
> the Qt/KDE transition to testing.
> [1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/09/msg00000.ht=
ml
> Perhaps you find that your package fails to compile with gcc4. If
> that's the case, there's probably a bug about it in the BTS, and it
> may include a patch. If not (or if you have doubts about the
> correctness of the patch), you may be able to find a fix in upstream's
> CVS, or in the Ubuntu distribution. If your package fails only in arm,
> m68k, and hppa, see instructions in the above mail.
> Finally, if there's a strong reason for which your package should not
> be NMUed, please note so in this bug report. Prospective NMUers will
> read your reasoning, and will decide if it's strong enough to delay
> their upload.
> Thanks for your cooperation, and happy hacking!
> P.S.: There may be an already reported bug against this package for
> this very same reason. I've checked for that, and will be merging the
> bugs soon. The reason for still filing this bug was to have the
> opportunity of including the small bits of information above. I
> apologize for the inconvenience.
I have been meaning to file a bug for the removal of this package, but
haven't goten around to it. It is dead upstream, and it's functionality
is duplicated by other programs in the archive. On top of that, the
general code quality is something less than I would like (which is why I
didn't want it releasing with stable). Thanks for the prodding - I will
request a removal now.
Please do not NMU this package, obviously, but I wanted to be clear :)
--=20
-----------------------------------------------------------------
| ,''`. Stephen Gran |
| : :' : [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
| `. `' Debian user, admin, and developer |
| `- http://www.debian.org |
-----------------------------------------------------------------
----- End forwarded message -----
--=20
Adeodato Sim=C3=B3
EM: asp16 [ykwim] alu.ua.es | PK: DA6AE621
Listening to: M=C2=AA Dolores Pradera - Te solt=C3=A9 la prenda
=20
To be nobody but yourself in a world which is doing its best night and
day to make you like everybody else means to fight the hardest battle
any human being can fight and never stop fighting.
-- e.e. cummings
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 328144-close) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Sep 2005 00:23:14 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Sep 15 17:23:14 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from jeroen by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EG3xy-0004WY-00; Thu, 15 Sep 2005 17:20:34 -0700
From: Debian Archive Maintenance <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: melanie $Revision: 1.43 $
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Bug#328144: fixed
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Jeroen van Wolffelaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2005 17:20:34 -0700
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following
package(s) have been removed from unstable:
kcdlabel | 2.13-KDE3-3 | source, alpha, arm, hppa, i386, ia64, m68k, mips,
mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc
Note that the package(s) have simply been removed from the tag
database and may (or may not) still be in the pool; this is not a bug.
The package(s) will be physically removed automatically when no suite
references them (and in the case of source, when no binary references
it). Please also remember that the changes have been done on the
master archive (ftp-master.debian.org) and will not propagate to any
mirrors (ftp.debian.org included) until the next cron.daily run at the
earliest.
Packages are never removed from testing by hand. Testing tracks
unstable and will automatically remove packages which were removed
from unstable when removing them from testing causes no dependency
problems.
Bugs which have been reported against this package are not automatically
removed from the Bug Tracking System. Please check all open bugs and
close them or re-assign them to another package if the removed package
was superseded by another one.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Jeroen van Wolffelaar (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
