Your message dated Tue, 07 Jun 2011 20:55:14 +0200
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line
has caused the Debian Bug report #601815,
regarding atlas custom requires ghostscript to build
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
601815: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=601815
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: libatlas3gf-base
Version: 3.8.3-28
# fakeroot debian/rules custom
[...]
==============================================
make -C TexDoc atlas_contrib.pdf atlas_devel.pdf atlas_install.pdf
cblasqref.pdf f77blasqref.pdf lapackqref.pdf
make[2]: Entering directory `/usr/local/src/atlas/atlas-3.8.3/TexDoc'
make[2]: `atlas_contrib.pdf' is up to date.
make[2]: `atlas_devel.pdf' is up to date.
make[2]: `atlas_install.pdf' is up to date.
ps2pdf14 cblasqref_pdf.ps cblasqref.pdf
make[2]: ps2pdf14: Command not found
make[2]: *** [cblasqref.pdf] Error 127
make[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/local/src/atlas/atlas-3.8.3/TexDoc'
make[1]: *** [build-arch-stamp] Error 2
make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/local/src/atlas/atlas-3.8.3'
make: *** [custom-stamp] Error 2
ps2pdf14 is in the ghostscript package.
ghostscript is listed in the Build-Depends but not in the README.Debian.gz
please either:
1. update the README.Debian.gz so that it adds ghostscript:
All dependencies can be installed with the following command:
# aptitude install build-essential dpkg-dev cdbs devscripts gfortran \
liblapack-dev liblapack-pic texlive-latex-base ghostscript
(also remove the commas from the second line so that it actually runs)
OR
2. provide a 'custom-nodocs' make target so that it is possible to build
just the libs without requiring either texlive-latex-base or ghostscript
to be installed. is there any reason why the docs would need to be
rebuilt due to CPU optimisations of the libs?
BTW, I noticed while it was compiling that make was running with '-j 1' - is
that optimal when building on a 4 or 8 core machine? i guess it's necessary
when it's running benchmarks to figure out the compile-time options, but is
it necessary when compiling the libraries?
thanks,
craig
--
craig sanders <[email protected]>
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
--- End Message ---
