Your message dated Fri, 16 Sep 2005 17:58:30 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#328633: common-lisp-controller: Security upload for 
CAN-2005-2657?
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Sep 2005 14:04:24 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Sep 16 07:04:21 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail.riseup.net [69.90.134.155] 
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
        id 1EGGpB-0003tO-00; Fri, 16 Sep 2005 07:04:21 -0700
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
        by mail.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 574C6A31F7;
        Fri, 16 Sep 2005 07:04:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.riseup.net ([127.0.0.1])
        by localhost (buffy [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP
        id 31018-38; Fri, 16 Sep 2005 07:04:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
        (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
        (No client certificate requested)
        by mail.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id B290BA31EF;
        Fri, 16 Sep 2005 07:04:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by pond (Postfix, from userid 1000)
        id D6D343A81F; Fri, 16 Sep 2005 00:36:41 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Micah Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: common-lisp-controller: Security upload for CAN-2005-2657?
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.17
Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2005 00:36:41 -0400
X-Debbugs-Cc: Debian Security Team <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at riseup.net
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-10.3 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,DATE_IN_PAST_06_12,
        HAS_PACKAGE,X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=ham 
        version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: common-lisp-controller
Version: 4.16
Severity: normal
Tags: security

Hi,

I notice that in DSA-811-1[1] that common-lisp-controller has a fix
for CAN-2005-2657 uploaded into stable, and the upload that is
recorded as fixing this issue in unstable is for version 4.18[2].
However, there has not been an upload to unstable since 4.16 on
8/3/05. Do you anticipate uploading a fix to unstable soon? Or is the
fixed version actually 4.16 and the DSA is incorrect?

Thanks,
Micah

1. http://www.debian.org/security/2005/dsa-811
2. "For the unstable distribution (sid) this problem has been fixed in
version 4.18."

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-2-k7
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 328633-done) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Sep 2005 15:58:35 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Sep 16 08:58:35 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from out4.smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.28] 
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
        id 1EGIbj-0006X3-00; Fri, 16 Sep 2005 08:58:35 -0700
Received: from frontend1.internal (mysql-sessions.internal [10.202.2.149])
        by frontend1.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46C81CCFEE8;
        Fri, 16 Sep 2005 11:58:34 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from frontend2.messagingengine.com ([10.202.2.151])
  by frontend1.internal (MEProxy); Fri, 16 Sep 2005 11:58:34 -0400
X-Sasl-enc: rfZuGBBvHihKPLShsi91MdyiAKw7l/NdD/YzDi7YdsTL 1126886313
Received: from sharrow (196-56.240.81.adsl.skynet.be [81.240.56.196])
        by frontend2.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62D5A570360;
        Fri, 16 Sep 2005 11:58:33 -0400 (EDT)
From: Peter Van Eynde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Micah Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#328633: common-lisp-controller: Security upload for 
CAN-2005-2657?
Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2005 17:58:30 +0200
User-Agent: KMail/1.7.2
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Organization: Debian
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

On Friday 16 September 2005 06:36, Micah Anderson wrote:
> However, there has not been an upload to unstable since 4.16 on
> 8/3/05. Do you anticipate uploading a fix to unstable soon? Or is the
> fixed version actually 4.16 and the DSA is incorrect?

Oeps. I was under the mistaken impression the security team would also upload 
the unstable version. 

I uploaded it now.

Thanks for the report.

Groetjes, Peter

-- 
signature -at- pvaneynd.mailworks.org 
http://www.livejournal.com/users/pvaneynd/
"God, root, what is difference?" Pitr | "God is more forgiving." Dave Aronson| 


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to