Your message dated Mon, 13 Jun 2011 10:17:25 +0000
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Bug#621226: fixed in eterm 0.9.5-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #621226,
regarding eterm: Getting rid of unneeded *.la / emptying dependency_libs
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
621226: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=621226
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: eterm
Severity: normal
User: [email protected]
Usertags: la-file-removal
To finish an old release goal from Squeeze, to comply with Policy
10.2 and to ease the introduction of MultiArch, I'm filing bugs
against packages which contain .la files which can be either removed
or stripped of the dependency_libs variable.
http://wiki.debian.org/ReleaseGoals/LAFileRemoval
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2011/04/msg00055.html
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2011/04/msg00199.html
Data has been obtained from the output of an automated script:
http://release.debian.org/~aba/la/current.txt
The output is best read in conjunction with the criteria from this
post to debian-devel:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2009/08/msg00808.html
To generate the list of packages, I've used:
grep -v depended-on current.txt |cut -d: -f1
The data is regularly updated but please accept my apologies if you
have made an upload which changes the situation since the data was
parsed.
eterm appears in this list as a source package because one or more of
the binary packages (usually -dev packages) contain .la files.
In most cases, the .la file(s) can simply be removed as the process
behind this MBF has already identified that there are no further
dependencies using the .la file. In the unusual case that your
package uses libltdl directly, it is still necessary to empty the
dependency_libs part of all .la files remaining in the package. Once
eterm is fixed, the process will repeat and other packages which you
maintain may need to be fixed in turn. It is important that packages
are fixed in sequence to avoid FTBFS bugs.
If you believe that your package needs both the .la file and the
dependency_libs settings, please raise this on debian-devel for
clarification.
--
Neil Williams
=============
[email protected]
http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: eterm
Source-Version: 0.9.5-3
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
eterm, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
eterm_0.9.5-3.diff.gz
to main/e/eterm/eterm_0.9.5-3.diff.gz
eterm_0.9.5-3.dsc
to main/e/eterm/eterm_0.9.5-3.dsc
eterm_0.9.5-3_i386.deb
to main/e/eterm/eterm_0.9.5-3_i386.deb
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to [email protected],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Luk Claes <[email protected]> (supplier of updated eterm package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [email protected])
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2011 11:52:11 +0200
Source: eterm
Binary: eterm
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.9.5-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Muammar El Khatib <[email protected]>
Changed-By: Luk Claes <[email protected]>
Description:
eterm - Enlightened Terminal Emulator
Closes: 621226
Changes:
eterm (0.9.5-3) unstable; urgency=low
.
* QA upload.
* Don't ship .la files (Closes: #621226).
Checksums-Sha1:
33bcf6fc8208c7e8cd777ea3a9fb4c754f6003e5 1136 eterm_0.9.5-3.dsc
065aef4b1bbae2be04b8d30497ad001ad90fbf81 10881 eterm_0.9.5-3.diff.gz
4cfec2aebe785744f3ce18bd252c004f54caf1d6 439870 eterm_0.9.5-3_i386.deb
Checksums-Sha256:
17d0be3000ef44ed6f64b6744fe9a72c004fe108e4d9094e57f42bf3d00cfa67 1136
eterm_0.9.5-3.dsc
c299cc6937d9bd96aa0418c042a7a0bd7d6d5d49ec271d1eb88f30d0fb9e1624 10881
eterm_0.9.5-3.diff.gz
4c373c4532f62dd2222279bdee1ffe885cf97d658db380ac226cc92dc7e0870f 439870
eterm_0.9.5-3_i386.deb
Files:
ab8d063ee168f1d4d095ff9abd7aea9f 1136 x11 optional eterm_0.9.5-3.dsc
31599dba49f244421720f3bfee100987 10881 x11 optional eterm_0.9.5-3.diff.gz
d279f125fa3988f58cbf85173f28795d 439870 x11 optional eterm_0.9.5-3_i386.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEARECAAYFAk314HAACgkQ5UTeB5t8Mo3apACffI53XoC3Rr3QtRxv78ZCQ2OZ
DuEAn26IntVx02WgbT2Y60WPP47zogWG
=ruON
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--- End Message ---
