Your message dated Mon, 13 Jun 2011 18:47:12 +0000
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Bug#621140: fixed in arpack++ 2.3-1.2
has caused the Debian Bug report #621140,
regarding arpack++: Getting rid of unneeded *.la / emptying dependency_libs
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
621140: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=621140
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: arpack++
Severity: normal
User: [email protected]
Usertags: la-file-removal
To finish an old release goal from Squeeze, to comply with Policy
10.2 and to ease the introduction of MultiArch, I'm filing bugs
against packages which contain .la files which can be either removed
or stripped of the dependency_libs variable.
http://wiki.debian.org/ReleaseGoals/LAFileRemoval
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2011/04/msg00055.html
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2011/04/msg00199.html
Data has been obtained from the output of an automated script:
http://release.debian.org/~aba/la/current.txt
The output is best read in conjunction with the criteria from this
post to debian-devel:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2009/08/msg00808.html
To generate the list of packages, I've used:
grep -v depended-on current.txt |cut -d: -f1
The data is regularly updated but please accept my apologies if you
have made an upload which changes the situation since the data was
parsed.
arpack++ appears in this list as a source package because one or more
of the binary packages (usually -dev packages) contain .la files.
In most cases, the .la file(s) can simply be removed as the process
behind this MBF has already identified that there are no further
dependencies using the .la file. In the unusual case that your
package uses libltdl directly, it is still necessary to empty the
dependency_libs part of all .la files remaining in the package. Once
arpack++ is fixed, the process will repeat and other packages which
you maintain may need to be fixed in turn. It is important that
packages are fixed in sequence to avoid FTBFS bugs.
If you believe that your package needs both the .la file and the
dependency_libs settings, please raise this on debian-devel for
clarification.
--
Neil Williams
=============
[email protected]
http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: arpack++
Source-Version: 2.3-1.2
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
arpack++, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
arpack++_2.3-1.2.diff.gz
to main/a/arpack++/arpack++_2.3-1.2.diff.gz
arpack++_2.3-1.2.dsc
to main/a/arpack++/arpack++_2.3-1.2.dsc
libarpack++2-dev_2.3-1.2_i386.deb
to main/a/arpack++/libarpack++2-dev_2.3-1.2_i386.deb
libarpack++2c2a_2.3-1.2_i386.deb
to main/a/arpack++/libarpack++2c2a_2.3-1.2_i386.deb
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to [email protected],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Luk Claes <[email protected]> (supplier of updated arpack++ package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [email protected])
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 08 Jun 2011 07:45:04 +0200
Source: arpack++
Binary: libarpack++2c2a libarpack++2-dev
Architecture: source i386
Version: 2.3-1.2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Scientific Computing Team
<[email protected]>
Changed-By: Luk Claes <[email protected]>
Description:
libarpack++2-dev - Object-oriented version of the ARPACK package (development)
libarpack++2c2a - Object-oriented version of the ARPACK package (runtime)
Closes: 621140
Changes:
arpack++ (2.3-1.2) unstable; urgency=low
.
* Non-maintainer upload.
* Stop shipping .la files (closes: #621140).
Checksums-Sha1:
9d84c702cad4ed6dd95a9c687f860513ed1b95ac 1343 arpack++_2.3-1.2.dsc
cb4a9b3d5b3a859271d132e6d8814350144a290c 3334 arpack++_2.3-1.2.diff.gz
afa301488c1c86d40d8abeda843f7e5b8f6e0cf7 11754 libarpack++2c2a_2.3-1.2_i386.deb
6cac4d237082a866212eea30efa0eecc337fc225 468778
libarpack++2-dev_2.3-1.2_i386.deb
Checksums-Sha256:
a3d33659bf2648ebb1c1782cbe343c336abdf1a5af770c2fb5b7a7ce132a538d 1343
arpack++_2.3-1.2.dsc
6a9658b00678b55e55a16417b94e26e0f02bf623c6b247935d8362da2845eacf 3334
arpack++_2.3-1.2.diff.gz
abc9808b6d2278eee63f1b784bbba4d2db0126dd8ce5907a9651bcffd464ba04 11754
libarpack++2c2a_2.3-1.2_i386.deb
6bfe4d01da23f2a3dd2aa8c5cf0c4d9f6b5356c1a1f5a306116060d5dd7d9876 468778
libarpack++2-dev_2.3-1.2_i386.deb
Files:
85988601718aa0c9aaa4f37dba47342d 1343 devel optional arpack++_2.3-1.2.dsc
aae98297cd89e5c6f7d4a1a2260e45be 3334 devel optional arpack++_2.3-1.2.diff.gz
ecbddf777470fe5914069d2984249da7 11754 libs optional
libarpack++2c2a_2.3-1.2_i386.deb
2059908ceef714f99ea140e07ebaea5d 468778 libdevel optional
libarpack++2-dev_2.3-1.2_i386.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEARECAAYFAk3vvZ0ACgkQ5UTeB5t8Mo06agCgj+3gHuXRwAy/mcUUHU8tYzAL
gUEAoLRko1mUiLy/Zn0NrXUg6kMaGnPU
=ArRF
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--- End Message ---
