Your message dated Sun, 10 Jul 2011 15:28:04 -0400
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line re: Should amphetamine be dropped from Debian?
has caused the Debian Bug report #538291,
regarding Should amphetamine be dropped from Debian?
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
538291: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=538291
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: amphetamine
Version: 0.8.10-14
Severity: important
The last upstream release was done in 2002. Today, the game looks very outdated
and it not that popular. Should we continue to maintain it?
Gonéri
-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.31-rc3-686 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL
set to fr_FR.UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Versions of packages amphetamine depends on:
ii amphetamine-data 0.8.7-12 data files for the game "Amphetami
ii libc6 2.9-21 GNU C Library: Shared libraries
ii libgcc1 1:4.4.1-1 GCC support library
ii libsdl1.2debian 1.2.13-4+b1 Simple DirectMedia Layer
ii libstdc++6 4.4.1-1 The GNU Standard C++ Library v3
ii libxpm4 1:3.5.7-2 X11 pixmap library
amphetamine recommends no packages.
amphetamine suggests no packages.
-- no debconf information
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
version: 0.8.10-15
I'm planning on maintaining it, and it does no harm to keep it around,
so I think it should stay.
Best wishes,
Mike
--- End Message ---
