Your message dated Wed, 20 Jul 2011 11:46:45 +0200
with message-id
<CAFm_bUjoBt1Bqg=rDSpX6bd96exN_x5-=eEhY-Fp+_QSoVN=_...@mail.gmail.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#575289: Documentation: cmdvartab and new-names.txt
has caused the Debian Bug report #575289,
regarding Documentation: cmdvartab and new-names.txt
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
575289: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=575289
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: nut
Version: 2.4.3-1
Severity: normal
1. upsd.users.5 states that the cmdvartab file is supplied with the
distribution.
The cmdvartab is not distributed in the deb.
2. The new-names.txt is included in the deb. It, and the cmdvartab file from the
source distribution, refers to each other. I am not sure which one is more
up
to date. Should new-names be renamed, so that the name gets more related to
its
contents ?
_________________________________________________________________
Hotmail: Free, trusted and rich email service.
https://signup.live.com/signup.aspx?id=60969
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Hi Regid,
2010/3/24 Regid Ichira <[email protected]>
>
> Package: nut
> Version: 2.4.3-1
> Severity: normal
>
> 1. upsd.users.5 states that the cmdvartab file is supplied with the
> distribution.
> The cmdvartab is not distributed in the deb.
>
this file is distributed and located in /usr/share/nut/cmdvartab
it's purpose is to be used by upsd to serve data description, which are then
displayed for example by upsrw.
2. The new-names.txt is included in the deb. It, and the cmdvartab file from
> the
> source distribution, refers to each other. I am not sure which one is
> more up
> to date. Should new-names be renamed, so that the name gets more
> related to its
> contents ?
>
with the full documentation (and website) revamp in 2.6.0, this file has
been renamed to nut-names.txt, and is available as an appendix in the user
and developer documentation:
http://www.networkupstools.org/docs/user-manual.chunked/apc.html
http://www.networkupstools.org/docs/developer-guide.chunked/apa.html
it's however still distributed in plain text format:
/usr/share/doc/nut/nut-names.txt.gz
but it sole purpose is documentation, conversely to cmdvartab.
I'm thus closing this bug. Don't hesitate to reopen if you feel there is
still something missing...
cheers,
Arnaud
--
Linux / Unix Expert R&D - Eaton - http://powerquality.eaton.com
Network UPS Tools (NUT) Project Leader - http://www.networkupstools.org/
Debian Developer - http://www.debian.org
Free Software Developer - http://arnaud.quette.free.fr/
--- End Message ---
