Your message dated Tue, 20 Sep 2005 11:07:18 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line fixed upstream
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Jan 2005 17:27:21 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jan 27 09:27:21 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from grace.wrladv.com [24.140.1.164]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1CuDQP-0003WV-00; Thu, 27 Jan 2005 09:27:21 -0800
Received: from gato.wrladv.com [24.140.1.162] by grace.wrladv.com with ESMTP
(SMTPD32-8.05) id A47266F0076; Thu, 27 Jan 2005 12:27:14 -0500
Received: from rfunk by gato.wrladv.com with local (Exim 4.34)
id 1CuDQN-0000AR-RS; Thu, 27 Jan 2005 12:27:19 -0500
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Rob Funk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: awstats: Nested includes warning shouldn't appear under Perl >= 5.6
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.2
Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2005 12:27:19 -0500
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
Package: awstats
Version: 6.2-1.1
Severity: minor
I use an awstats configuration with nested includes, so the top of my stats
pages says "Warning: Perl versions before 5.6 cannot handle nested includes"
(from line 1157 of awstats.pl). However, I'm running Perl 5.8.4.
The script should detect that I'm not running an old Perl, and not show me
that warning.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing'), (50, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.7-1-686-smp
Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ISO-8859-1)
Versions of packages awstats depends on:
ii perl [libstorable-perl] 5.8.4-5 Larry Wall's Practical Extraction
-- no debconf information
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 292529-close) by bugs.debian.org; 20 Sep 2005 15:07:19 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Sep 20 08:07:19 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from www.frogcircus.org (mail.frogcircus.org) [64.251.25.83]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EHjiI-0005Wl-00; Tue, 20 Sep 2005 08:07:19 -0700
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
(uid 1000)
by mail.frogcircus.org with local; Tue, 20 Sep 2005 11:07:18 -0400
id 00287BE7.433025A6.00003B55
Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2005 11:07:18 -0400
From: Charles Fry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: fixed upstream
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature";
boundary="=_www.frogcircus.org-15189-1127228838-0001-2"
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Operating-System: Linux www.frogcircus.org 2.6.11.4
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.5 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_10 autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
This is a MIME-formatted message. If you see this text it means that your
E-mail software does not support MIME-formatted messages.
--=_www.frogcircus.org-15189-1127228838-0001-2
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi,
I am closing this bug, as it appears to have been fixed upstream. Please
don't hesitate to repon it if I missed something, and you feel that the
bug has not been adequately dealt with.
thanks,
Charles
--=20
Dear lover boy,
Your photo came
But your doggone beard
Won't fit
The frame
Burma-Shave
http://burma-shave.org/jingles/1960/dear_lover_boy
--=_www.frogcircus.org-15189-1127228838-0001-2
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFDMCWmhiAFUap5uRoRAi05AJ9lOQExRuuI8iZHgiqNOW0oR2sWMACeLiLF
uXYIDB4S5EH0zGqciCZA+8c=
=Zcg9
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=_www.frogcircus.org-15189-1127228838-0001-2--
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
