Your message dated Wed, 03 Aug 2011 06:47:09 +0000
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Bug#634786: fixed in pax-utils 0.2.2-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #634786,
regarding pax-utils: debian/control uses hardcoded list of non-Linux
architectures
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
634786: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=634786
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: pax-utils
Severity: wishlist
User: [email protected]
Usertags: linux-any
The debian/control file in pax-utils uses a negated list of architectures
to specify a package relationship (most likely Build-Depends) on a
Linux-specific package. I.e. something like:
Build-Depends: libfoo-dev [!kfreebsd-i386 !kfreebsd-amd64 !hurd-i386]
This is problematic because it will fail for any future kfreebsd-* or hurd-*
architecture (like the upcoming kfreebsd-mipsel port). The correct way
would be to use dpkg architecture wildcards, e.g.:
Build-Depends: libfoo-dev [linux-any]
Please consider making this adjustment to make life easier for future
porting efforts.
Thanks!
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: pax-utils
Source-Version: 0.2.2-2
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
pax-utils, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
pax-utils_0.2.2-2.debian.tar.gz
to main/p/pax-utils/pax-utils_0.2.2-2.debian.tar.gz
pax-utils_0.2.2-2.dsc
to main/p/pax-utils/pax-utils_0.2.2-2.dsc
pax-utils_0.2.2-2_amd64.deb
to main/p/pax-utils/pax-utils_0.2.2-2_amd64.deb
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to [email protected],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Yves-Alexis Perez <[email protected]> (supplier of updated
pax-utils package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [email protected])
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 03 Aug 2011 08:33:21 +0200
Source: pax-utils
Binary: pax-utils
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 0.2.2-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Yves-Alexis Perez <[email protected]>
Changed-By: Yves-Alexis Perez <[email protected]>
Description:
pax-utils - Security-focused ELF files checking tool
Closes: 634786
Changes:
pax-utils (0.2.2-2) unstable; urgency=low
.
* debian/control:
- replace chpax by paxctl in suggests.
- use linux-any in libcap-dev build-dep. closes: #634786
- update standards version to 3.9.2.
Checksums-Sha1:
7dc990fe22c856716077bda8b51489f44444ff25 1801 pax-utils_0.2.2-2.dsc
3459834e1c54e85e7b2bd2e04377e4c84923f136 2744 pax-utils_0.2.2-2.debian.tar.gz
4febdcdfb4cf910a5f8bcc95cbab86ba8e451ae4 101088 pax-utils_0.2.2-2_amd64.deb
Checksums-Sha256:
c139554fbf998eb7afad8e50f1e969761467f0920088d47b3c20be637db333a5 1801
pax-utils_0.2.2-2.dsc
d1b55144c0b7eab0a2fff5daa5b5ab2787519fef8608ed7366bb4b6198eec5be 2744
pax-utils_0.2.2-2.debian.tar.gz
d151ecc82f340308580f08e6f4516946f4827de6738769c21b4d0e9fd95cbdf5 101088
pax-utils_0.2.2-2_amd64.deb
Files:
d52515745ad6653870527ae98f49d751 1801 misc extra pax-utils_0.2.2-2.dsc
a9ae71ce3567075f718d68e4d635e370 2744 misc extra
pax-utils_0.2.2-2.debian.tar.gz
af283c98d0415b2695321d329a02ae1c 101088 misc extra pax-utils_0.2.2-2_amd64.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)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=DprR
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--- End Message ---
