Your message dated Wed, 21 Sep 2005 13:15:07 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Recent xscreensaver versions have these fixes built-in
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 4 May 2002 18:51:19 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat May 04 13:51:19 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail.gmx.net [213.165.64.20] 
        by master.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
        id 1744co-0007mu-00; Sat, 04 May 2002 13:51:18 -0500
Received: (qmail 24737 invoked by uid 0); 4 May 2002 18:48:15 -0000
Received: from pd9eb8b7c.dip.t-dialin.net (HELO ss20.ms20.nix) (217.235.139.124)
  by mail.gmx.net (mp002-rz3) with SMTP; 4 May 2002 18:48:15 -0000
Received: from flip (flip.ms20.nix [192.168.6.1])
        by ss20.ms20.nix (Postfix) with ESMTP id 749B51D8
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat,  4 May 2002 20:48:14 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from agx by flip with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
        id 1744Zq-00024w-00
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 04 May 2002 20:48:14 +0200
Date: Sat, 4 May 2002 20:48:13 +0200
From: Guido Guenther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: xscreensaver-gnome: xscreensaver-demo calls x-terminal-emulator with 
"+sb"
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
X-Reportbug-Version: 1.50
Sender: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Package: xscreensaver-gnome
Version: 3.34-3
Severity: normal

Hi,
When one hits "Documentation..." in xscreensaver-demo,
x-terminal-emulator is called with the "+sb" option:

execve("/usr/bin/x-terminal-emulator", ["/usr/bin/x-terminal-emulator",
"+sb", "-T", "electricsheep manual", "-e", "/bin/sh", "-c", "man 
\"electricsheep\" || read foo"]

but a x-terminal-emulator is not required to support "+sb" by policy. At
least the multi-gnome-terminal wrapper doesn't support +sb and
displaying the manpage fails. Please remove the "+sb" option from the
call to x-terminal-emulator.
Regards,
 -- Guido

-- System Information
Debian Release: 3.0
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux flip 2.4.18-flip #1 Sun Apr 14 01:25:04 CEST 2002 i686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C

Versions of packages xscreensaver-gnome depends on:
ii  gdk-imlib1                   1.9.14-2    Gdk-Imlib is an imaging library fo
ii  libart2                      1.4.1.4-3   The Gnome canvas widget - runtime 
ii  libaudiofile0                0.2.3-4     The Audiofile Library
ii  libc6                        2.2.5-4     GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libcapplet0                  1:1.4.0.5-3 Library for Gnome Control Center a
ii  libdb3                       3.2.9-16    Berkeley v3 Database Libraries [ru
ii  libesd0                      0.2.23-3    Enlightened Sound Daemon - Shared 
ii  libglib1.2                   1.2.10-4    The GLib library of C routines
ii  libgnome32                   1.4.1.4-3   The Gnome libraries
ii  libgnomesupport0             1.4.1.4-3   The Gnome libraries (Support libra
ii  libgnomeui32                 1.4.1.4-3   The Gnome libraries (User Interfac
ii  libgnorba27                  1.4.1.4-3   Gnome CORBA services
ii  libgtk1.2                    1.2.10-11   The GIMP Toolkit set of widgets fo
ii  liborbit0                    0.5.15-2    Libraries for ORBit - a CORBA ORB
ii  xlibs                        4.1.0-16    X Window System client libraries
ii  xscreensaver                 3.34-3      Automatic screensaver for X

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 145814-close) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Sep 2005 11:15:20 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Sep 21 04:15:20 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail.charite.de [160.45.207.131] 
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
        id 1EI2ZM-0001dw-00; Wed, 21 Sep 2005 04:15:20 -0700
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
        by mail.charite.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id A49B522108A;
        Wed, 21 Sep 2005 13:15:18 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from mail.charite.de ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (mail.charite.de [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10025)
 with ESMTP id 01359-05-2; Wed, 21 Sep 2005 13:15:07 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from postamt.charite.de (postamt.charite.de [160.45.207.132])
        (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
        (Client did not present a certificate)
        by mail.charite.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id B068C221071;
        Wed, 21 Sep 2005 13:15:07 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by postamt.charite.de (Postfix, from userid 7945)
        id 3AAD62209A2; Wed, 21 Sep 2005 13:15:07 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2005 13:15:07 +0200
From: Ralf Hildebrandt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
        [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
        [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Recent xscreensaver versions have these fixes built-in
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.10i
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at charite.de
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no 
        version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 5

While wading through the BTS I found this bug to be fixed, but never
closed. 


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to