Your message dated Mon, 15 Aug 2011 14:11:50 +0200
with message-id
<CAPdtAj10Tcq9Qp8-U1SY=4yi5oaqszvd4tortsxjya8jyq5...@mail.gmail.com>
and subject line Re: mrtg: Binaries in package should start with mrtg* (not
e.g. cfgmaker)
has caused the Debian Bug report #282461,
regarding mrtg: Binaries in package should tsrat with mrtg* (not e.g. cfgmaker)
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
282461: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=282461
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: mrtg
Version: 2.10.13-1
Severity: normal
It would be more consistent if the naming of the programs would
be kept withing the bounds of package. For example there is program
cfgmaker
but the name selected is unfortunate. How can people tell that it belongs
to mrtg?
It would be better if programs belonging to package somehow used the package
prefix:
mrtg => mrtg
cfgmaker => mrtg-cfgmaker
rateup => mrtg-rateup
indexmaker => mrtg-indexmaker
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.4.26-1-386
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (ignored: LC_ALL set to en_US)
Versions of packages mrtg depends on:
ii debconf 1.4.30.10 Debian configuration management sy
ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-18 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii libsnmp-session-perl 1.07-1 Perl support for accessing SNMP-aw
ii perl 5.8.4-3 Larry Wall's Practical Extraction
ii perl-modules 5.8.4-3 Core Perl modules
-- debconf information:
mrtg/own_user: true
* mrtg/conf_mods: true
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Sorry it took so long for a reply. mrtg is one of the most known tool
for monitoring, and tons of doc on the web refers to it and to its
tool, callong them cfgmaker, idxmaker and so on, so while I understand
your position and I'm also in favor to it, I won't let Debian diverge
from that . Closing.
Regards,
--
Sandro Tosi (aka morph, morpheus, matrixhasu)
My website: http://matrixhasu.altervista.org/
Me at Debian: http://wiki.debian.org/SandroTosi
--- End Message ---
