Your message dated Fri, 26 Aug 2011 22:32:30 +0000
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Bug#634490: fixed in fotowall 0.9-6
has caused the Debian Bug report #634490,
regarding fotowall: debian/control uses hardcoded list of non-Linux
architectures
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
634490: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=634490
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: fotowall
Severity: wishlist
User: [email protected]
Usertags: linux-any
The debian/control file in fotowall uses a negated list of architectures
to specify a package relationship (most likely Build-Depends) on a
Linux-specific package. I.e. something like:
Build-Depends: libfoo-dev [!kfreebsd-i386 !kfreebsd-amd64 !hurd-i386]
This is problematic because it will fail for any future kfreebsd-* or hurd-*
architecture (like the upcoming kfreebsd-mipsel port). The correct way
would be to use dpkg architecture wildcards, e.g.:
Build-Depends: libfoo-dev [linux-any]
Please consider making this adjustment to make life easier for future
porting efforts.
Thanks!
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: fotowall
Source-Version: 0.9-6
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
fotowall, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
fotowall_0.9-6.debian.tar.gz
to main/f/fotowall/fotowall_0.9-6.debian.tar.gz
fotowall_0.9-6.dsc
to main/f/fotowall/fotowall_0.9-6.dsc
fotowall_0.9-6_amd64.deb
to main/f/fotowall/fotowall_0.9-6_amd64.deb
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to [email protected],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Patrick Matthäi <[email protected]> (supplier of updated fotowall package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [email protected])
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2011 21:27:44 +0200
Source: fotowall
Binary: fotowall
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 0.9-6
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Patrick Matthäi <[email protected]>
Changed-By: Patrick Matthäi <[email protected]>
Description:
fotowall - simple application for creating collages and compositions
Closes: 634490
Changes:
fotowall (0.9-6) unstable; urgency=low
.
* Use linux-any instead of hardcoded architecture list.
Closes: #634490
* Add missing build-arch and build-indep target.
Checksums-Sha1:
3ac7829840e6bf608f70a9b825887d0febc8aab7 1756 fotowall_0.9-6.dsc
df07fc26c4b8fc273bfed9cb02a2b6600fea7fa0 11341 fotowall_0.9-6.debian.tar.gz
9e1e68a89fb9f1902be45b3c3a1ea9b965a83612 862854 fotowall_0.9-6_amd64.deb
Checksums-Sha256:
cc5ce6093d2334edc67f5c1fa600cb31c5857ec5f387153b5b42383cbdc9fb25 1756
fotowall_0.9-6.dsc
3525ed84184879dad765aed9b137f207dac10d3c9cc8fbd5d95874141b79327c 11341
fotowall_0.9-6.debian.tar.gz
a69f0113c4f6a951bae0124e19dffe936174a384521760889e06c997997129a6 862854
fotowall_0.9-6_amd64.deb
Files:
feb300a2ea855df149d5bd5348eaca95 1756 kde optional fotowall_0.9-6.dsc
a3cae91c9ca51a7810964f4207101111 11341 kde optional
fotowall_0.9-6.debian.tar.gz
d15683a9e599647858c61778c37de60c 862854 kde optional fotowall_0.9-6_amd64.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)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=wtZV
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--- End Message ---
