Your message dated Fri, 2 Sep 2011 13:24:33 +0200
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#637098: Please respect /etc/debian_chroot
has caused the Debian Bug report #637098,
regarding Please respect /etc/debian_chroot
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
637098: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=637098
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: udev
Severity: wishlist
Hi,
please also return 1 in chrooted() if /etc/debian_chroot is missing.
that could serve for more generic workaround for #620921, let me know if
you want me to touch /etc/debian_chroot in the debian template of lxc.
--
Address: Daniel Baumann, Donnerbuehlweg 3, CH-3012 Bern
Email: [email protected]
Internet: http://people.progress-technologies.net/~daniel.baumann/
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Closing due to lack of feedback.
On Aug 08, Marco d'Itri <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Aug 08, Daniel Baumann <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > please also return 1 in chrooted() if /etc/debian_chroot is missing.
> Why? chrooted() actually verifies if the script is running in a chroot.
>
> > that could serve for more generic workaround for #620921, let me know if
> > you want me to touch /etc/debian_chroot in the debian template of lxc.
> I do not believe that you should since containers are not chrooted
> environments (or at least they should not, anyway they should be
> configured to not allow packages to interfere with the host).
>
> --
> ciao,
> Marco
--
ciao,
Marco
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--- End Message ---
