Your message dated Thu, 22 Sep 2005 10:03:02 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Closing leftover bugs
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Feb 2005 03:56:28 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Feb 14 19:56:28 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from smtp10.wanadoo.fr [193.252.22.21]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1D0tp6-0008Kg-00; Mon, 14 Feb 2005 19:56:28 -0800
Received: from me-wanadoo.net (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by mwinf1007.wanadoo.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id E6D012800122;
Tue, 15 Feb 2005 04:55:56 +0100 (CET)
Received: from argos.server.maison
(AToulouse-152-1-6-237.w82-125.abo.wanadoo.fr [82.125.4.237])
by mwinf1007.wanadoo.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id AD0782800121;
Tue, 15 Feb 2005 04:55:56 +0100 (CET)
X-ME-UUID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from prahal by argos.server.maison with local (Exim 4.44)
id 1D0tob-0001XJ-I3; Tue, 15 Feb 2005 04:55:57 +0100
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2005 04:55:57 +0100
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: swig: lib symlink broken , missing dependency ?
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Reportbug-Version: 3.7.1
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.4 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,
NO_REAL_NAME autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
Package: swig
Version: 1.3.22-6
Severity: normal
Hi
ldconfig -v gives me a few errors:
ldconfig: Cannot stat /usr/lib/libswigguile.so: No such file or directory
ldconfig: Cannot stat /usr/lib/libswigguilescm.so: No such file or directory
ldconfig: Cannot stat /usr/lib/libswigchicken.so: No such file or directory
swig provides:
/usr/lib/libswigguile.so
/usr/lib/libswigguilescm.so
which are symlinks to
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 25 2005-02-09 02:15 /usr/lib/libswigguilescm.so ->
libswigguilescm-1.3.22.so
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 22 2005-02-09 02:15 /usr/lib/libswigguile.so ->
libswigguile-1.3.22.so
libswigguilescm-1.3.22.so and libswigguilescm-1.3.22.so are provided by
libswig1.3.22-guile but swig does not even suggest it.
the same to happen for libswigchicken1.3.22
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 24 2005-02-09 02:15 /usr/lib/libswigchicken.so ->
libswigchicken-1.3.22.so
It seems to me those .so should go in the -dev packages, though i
have not yet fully understand the debian manage that (a lot of
packages still link against .so instead of .so.version ...).
I don't know the severity of this problem (maybe no program use
those librairies, there seems to have been no other report about
that). Anyway i would prefer the new version being upload before
this i refrain from being pedantic (this new fix real bugs, maybe
even this one).
Regards
Alban
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.11-rc4
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=UTF-8)
Versions of packages swig depends on:
ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-20 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii libgcc1 1:4.0-0pre5 GCC support library
ii libstdc++5 1:3.3.5-8 The GNU Standard C++ Library v3
ii libswig1.3.22 1.3.22-6 Runtime support libraries for swig
-- no debconf information
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 295327-done) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Sep 2005 08:03:06 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Sep 22 01:03:06 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de [212.227.126.183]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EIM2r-0001Cz-00; Thu, 22 Sep 2005 01:03:05 -0700
Received: from Fd102.f.strato-dslnet.de [195.4.209.2] (helo=stargate.galaxy)
by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de with ESMTP (Nemesis),
id 0ML25U-1EIM2q12mU-0004ji; Thu, 22 Sep 2005 10:03:04 +0200
Received: by stargate.galaxy (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 157211807D; Thu, 22 Sep 2005 10:03:03 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2005 10:03:02 +0200
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Closing leftover bugs
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Torsten Landschoff)
X-Provags-ID: kundenserver.de [EMAIL PROTECTED]
login:d638a0eb9c9fbc21c426336ab6dfa19b
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2
This bug is still marked pending for upload of swig 1.3.24 which has
already happened for months now. Closing it...
Greetings
Torsten
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
