Your message dated Thu, 22 Sep 2005 17:18:25 -0600
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line WNPP bug closing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 31 May 2004 23:39:00 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon May 31 16:39:00 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from a81-197-3-110.elisa-laajakaista.fi (ns.cante.net) [81.197.3.110]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BUwMt-0000uO-00; Mon, 31 May 2004 16:38:59 -0700
Received: from root by ns.cante.net with local (Exim 4.34)
id 1BUwMj-0001dC-UD; Tue, 01 Jun 2004 02:38:55 +0300
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Jari Aalto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.61
Date: Tue, 01 Jun 2004 02:38:49 +0300
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: <locally generated>
X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: RFP: gfile -- Light weight Gtk/Gnome file manager
X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.0 (built Sat, 24 Apr 2004 12:31:30 +0200)
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on ns.cante.net)
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name : gfile
Version : 0.0.9
Upstream Author : Name <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://lab.erasme.org/gfile/index.html
* License : GPL
Description : Light weight Gtk/Gnome file manager
>From developer's page (there are screen shots at
http://lab.erasme.org/gfile_screen_shot/index.html ):
... GFile is a file manager for Linux. It is based on Gtk/Gnome. It is in
developpement. If I have started this project, it is because I haven't found
file manager under Linux with a "tree" like explorer under Windows 95. I found
this usefull to visually know where you are. The project started in august 1998.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.4.26.20040505
Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (ignored: LC_ALL set to en_US)
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 251982-done) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Sep 2005 23:18:26 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Sep 22 16:18:26 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from merkel.debian.org [192.25.206.16] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EIaKg-0001mM-00; Thu, 22 Sep 2005 16:18:26 -0700
Received: from damog by merkel.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EIaKf-0006vD-00; Thu, 22 Sep 2005 17:18:25 -0600
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: WNPP bug closing
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: David Moreno Garza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2005 17:18:25 -0600
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,VALID_BTS_CONTROL
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Hello,
This is an automatic mail sent to close the RFP you have reported or
are involved with.
Your RFP wnpp bug is being closed because of the following reasons:
- It is, as of today, older than 365 days.
- It hasn't had any activity recently.
As this an automatic procedure, it could of course have something
wrong and probably it would be closing some bugs that are not
intended by owners and submitters (like you) to be closed, for
example if the RFP is still of your interest, or there has been
some kind of activity around it. In that case, please reopen the
bug, do it, DO IT NOW! (I don't want to be blamed because of
mass closing and not let people know that they can easily reopen
their bugs ;-).
To re-open it, you simply have to mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a body text like this:
reopen 251982
thanks bts
Further comments on the work done in the bug sent to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] would be truly welcomed.
Anyway, if you have any kind of problems when dealing with
the BTS, feel free to contact me and I'd be more than happy to help
you on this: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
This is the second massive wnpp closing that is being done. The next close
will be done on inactive RFPs older than 365 days and finally, an automatic
script will close, by default, *inactive* RFPs when they reach one year of
inactivity.
A similar process is being applied to other kind of wnpp bugs.
Thanks for your cooperation,
-- David Moreno Garza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Thu, 22 Sep 2005 17:06:42 -0500
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
